| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 Oxford University Press
CORRESPONDENCE |
Re: Role of Detection Method in Predicting Breast Cancer Survival: Analysis of Randomized Screening Trials
Affiliations of authors: Unit of Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology, Centre for Study and Prevention of Cancer, Research Institute of Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy (EP, EC, MZ); Unit of Epidemiology, Centre for Prevention of Cancer, Turin, Italy (AP, NS)
Correspondence to: Eugenio Paci, MD, Epidemiology Unit, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, Italy 50135 (e-mail: e.paci@cspo.it).
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Method of detection is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer survival, according to the analysis of the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) and Canadian trials presented by Shen et al. (1); i.e., there is an increased likelihood that mammography screening is detecting slowly growing, indolent tumors, compared with aggressive tumors diagnosed in clinical settings. However, the authors did not perform a survival analysis by intention to
Response to this Correspondence
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1854.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Shen and D. A. Berry RESPONSE: Re: Role of Detection Method in Predicting Breast Cancer Survival: Analysis of Randomized Screening Trials J Natl Cancer Inst, December 21, 2005; 97(24): 1854 - 1854. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
