| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 Oxford University Press
NEWS |
FDA Considers Tightening Regulations for Direct-to-Consumer Advertising
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In August, the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) sought to curb growing public criticism over its consumer advertising practices by releasing voluntary advertising guidelines. The document stated that drug advertising should serve the public health by "increasing awareness about diseases" and "educating patients about treatment options."
The voluntary PhRMA guidelines are viewed by some as an attempt to placate the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is considering tighter regulations on consumer drug advertising. In November, the agency held a 2-day hearing to solicit input from consumer advocates and the drug industry on how to proceed.
Current guidelines, put in place in 1997, allow drug companies to advertise directly to consumers if such ads balance supposed benefits with possible risks. Drug companies must submit advertisements for FDA review only at the time of airing; the FDA has no power to force
Balancing Risks
Ad Delays
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kallen, S. Woloshin, J. Shu, E. Juhl, and L. Schwartz Direct-To-Consumer Advertisements For HIV Antiretroviral Medications: A Progress Report Health Aff., September 1, 2007; 26(5): 1392 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Abel, R. T. Penson, S. Joffe, L. Schapira, B. A. Chabner, and T. J. Lynch Jr. Direct-to-Consumer Advertising in Oncology. Oncologist, February 1, 2006; 11(2): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

