Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(21):1621; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji348
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Querleu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ferron, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Querleu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ferron, G.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Denis Querleu, Gwenael Ferron

Affiliation of authors: Department of Surgery, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, French Guiana

Correspondence to: Denis Querleu, MD, Department of Surgery, Institut Claudius Regaud, 20 rue du Pont Saint Pierre, Toulouse, 31052, France (e-mail: querleu@icr.fnclcc.fr).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Benedetti Panici et al. (1) should be commended for having tried to address the controversial issue of the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in patients with optimally or completely debulked stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma. They conclude—and this finding could be considered from now on as the current state of the art—that node . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Response to this Correspondence

RESPONSE: Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Roberto Angioli, Natalina Manci, Fabio Landoni, Angelo Maggioni, Neville Hacker, Tiziana Dell'Anna, and Roldano Fossati
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1621-1622. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

RESPONSE: Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Setsuko K. Chambers, David S. Alberts, and Kenneth D. Hatch
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1622-1623. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]