Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(21):1620-1621; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji347
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morice, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castaigne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morice, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castaigne, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Philippe Morice, Patricia Pautier, Catherine Lhommé, Damienne Castaigne

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Surgery (PM, DC) and Gynecology (PP, CL), Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Correspondence to: Philippe Morice, MD, Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France (e-mail: morice@igr.fr).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We read with great interest the article by Benedetti Panici et al. (1) on the results of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. We also read the editorial about this trial by Chambers (2), but we do not totally agree with her conclusions.

This trial confirms the high rate of nodal involvement in advanced-stage ovarian cancer (70% of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Response to this Correspondence

RESPONSE: Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Roberto Angioli, Natalina Manci, Fabio Landoni, Angelo Maggioni, Neville Hacker, Tiziana Dell'Anna, and Roldano Fossati
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1621-1622. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

RESPONSE: Re: Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Setsuko K. Chambers, David S. Alberts, and Kenneth D. Hatch
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1622-1623. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]