Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(2):152; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

RESPONSE: Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)

Gordon J. S. Rustin

Correspondence to: Gordon J. S. Rustin, MD, FRCP, Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, HA62RN, UK (e-mail: gordon.rustin@whht.nhs.uk)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Taylor and Haverstick make an interesting observation that there was no interference in CA125 levels by HAMA when the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Correspondence

Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)
Peyton T. Taylor and Doris Haverstick
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 151. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]