| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 Oxford University Press
CORRESPONDENCE |
Re: Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
Affiliation of authors: Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego
Correspondence to: Ronghui Xu, PhD, Moores Cancer Center, 9500 Gilman Dr., Mail Code 0112, La Jolla, CA 92093-0112 (e-mail: rxu@ucsd.edu).
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
We read with interest the paper by Ransohoff (1), which addresses the important issue of validity of published results in "-omics" fields to assess molecular markers for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. The commentary was directly motivated by the debate around an initial study
Response to this Correspondence
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1227.