Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(16):1168-1169; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minna, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gazdar, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minna, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gazdar, A. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

EDITORIAL

Gefitinib Versus Cetuximab in Lung Cancer: Round One

John D. Minna, Michael J. Peyton, Adi F. Gazdar

Affiliation of authors: Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Correspondence to: John D. Minna, MD, Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75309-8593 (e-mail: john.minna@utsouthwestern.edu).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Despite clinically significant advances in conventional forms of chemotherapy (1), the prospects for long-term control of lung cancer reside in therapies targeted to specific molecular changes that are characteristic of the tumor and whose function the tumor must maintain to survive (oncogenic changes to which the tumor is "addicted"). Just over a year ago, intense excitement was generated by the finding that mutations in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are highly predictive (in general) of clinical responses to EGFR TK inhibitors (TKIs) (2,3). In this issue of the Journal, Mukohara et al. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. P. Cunningham, H. Thomas, Z. Fan, and H. Modjtahedi
Responses of Human Colorectal Tumor Cells to Treatment with the Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody ICR62 Used Alone and in Combination with the EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Gefitinib.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7708 - 7715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]