Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(9):717-718; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh129
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rockette, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rockette, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer: Has Promise Outstripped Performance?

David Gur, Jules H. Sumkin, Lara A. Hardesty, Howard E. Rockette

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Radiology (DG, JHS, LAH, HER) and Biostatistics (HER), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Correspondence to: David Gur, ScD, Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket St., Ste. 4200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (e-mail: gurd@upmc.edu)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The editorial (1) that accompanied our article (2) regarding the effects of computer-aided detection on our practice highlighted two limitations of our study: the possible impact of changes in the fraction of women undergoing repeat examinations and the possible underestimation of cancer rates. We wish to clarify these two issues as related to our study. First, ours was . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

RESPONSE: Re: Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer: Has Promise Outstripped Performance?
Joann G. Elmore and Patricia A. Carney
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 718. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
D. Gur
Technology and Practice Assessment: In Search of a "Desirable" Statement
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 659 - 660.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Gur, J. H. Sumkin, and H. E. Rockette
RESPONSE: Re: Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 2004; 96(16): 1261 - 1261.
[Full Text] [PDF]