Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(6):487-488; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh081
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vermorken, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vermorken, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)

Gordon J. S. Rustin, Michael Quinn, Tate Thigpen, Andreas du Bois, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Anders Jakobsen, Elizabeth Eisenhauer, Satoru Sagae, Kathryn Greven, Ignace Vergote, Andres Cervantes, Jan Vermorken

Affiliations of authors: Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, U.K. (GR); The Australian and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Victoria, Australia (MQ); The Gynecologic Oncology Group, Philadelphia, PA (TT); Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (ADB); Group d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France (EPL); The Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology, Linkóping, Sweden (AJ); National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (EE); Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group, Tokyo, Japan (SS); Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia (KG); The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium (IV); Spanish Group for Research on Ovarian Cancer, Barcelona, Spain (AC); Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup, Bethesda, MD (JV)

Correspondence to: Gordon J. S. Rustin, MD, FRCP, Mount Vernon Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, The Clock Tower, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, U.K. (e-mail: gordon.rustin@whht.nhs.uk)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) believes that definitions for response and progression of ovarian cancer according to serum CA 125 levels should be incorporated into ovarian cancer clinical trial protocols for relapse therapy. Although the GCIG is convinced of the value of the definition of progression that incorporates both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and CA 125 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)
Peyton T. Taylor and Doris Haverstick
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 151. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

RESPONSE: Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)
Gordon J. S. Rustin
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 152. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. C. Fong, D. S. Boss, T. A. Yap, A. Tutt, P. Wu, M. Mergui-Roelvink, P. Mortimer, H. Swaisland, A. Lau, M. J. O'Connor, et al.
Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumors from BRCA Mutation Carriers
N. Engl. J. Med., July 9, 2009; 361(2): 123 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Swanton, B. Nicke, M. Schuett, A. C. Eklund, C. Ng, Q. Li, T. Hardcastle, A. Lee, R. Roy, P. East, et al.
Chromosomal instability determines taxane response
PNAS, May 26, 2009; 106(21): 8671 - 8676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. S.P. Tan, C. Rothermundt, K. Thomas, E. Bancroft, R. Eeles, S. Shanley, A. Ardern-Jones, A. Norman, S. B. Kaye, and M. E. Gore
"BRCAness" Syndrome in Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study Describing the Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5530 - 5536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. M. Schultheis, G. Lurje, K. E. Rhodes, W. Zhang, D. Yang, A. A. Garcia, R. Morgan, D. Gandara, S. Scudder, A. Oza, et al.
Polymorphisms and Clinical Outcome in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cyclophosphamide and Bevacizumab
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7554 - 7563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Gulley, P. M. Arlen, K.-Y. Tsang, J. Yokokawa, C. Palena, D. J. Poole, C. Remondo, V. Cereda, J. L. Jones, M. P. Pazdur, et al.
Pilot Study of Vaccination with Recombinant CEA-MUC-1-TRICOM Poxviral-Based Vaccines in Patients with Metastatic Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 3060 - 3069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. S. Rader, C. F. Aylsworth, D. A. Juckett, D. G. Mutch, M. A. Powell, L. Lippmann, and N. V. Dimitrov
Phase I Study and Preliminary Pharmacology of the Novel Innate Immune Modulator rBBX-01 in Gynecologic Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 3089 - 3097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. P.B. O'Connor, G. C. Jayson, A. Jackson, D. Ghiorghiu, B. M. Carrington, C. J. Rose, S. J. Mills, R. Swindell, C. Roberts, C. L. Mitchell, et al.
Enhancing Fraction Predicts Clinical Outcome following First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6130 - 6135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Marsh, J. Paul, C. R. King, G. Gifford, H. L. McLeod, and R. Brown
Pharmacogenetic Assessment of Toxicity and Outcome After Platinum Plus Taxane Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: The Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4528 - 4535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. K. Tummala and W. P. McGuire
Ovarian Cancer, CA-125 Addiction, and Informed Confusion: Much Ado About Less
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3570 - 3571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. L. Coleman, A. Gordon, J. Barter, S. Sun, W. Rackoff, and T. J. Herzog
Early Changes in CA125 After Treatment with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin or Topotecan Do Not Always Reflect Best Response in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients
Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. J.S. Rustin, P. Timmers, A. Nelstrop, G. Shreeves, S. M. Bentzen, B. Baron, M. J. Piccart, K. Bertelsen, G. Stuart, J. Cassidy, et al.
Comparison of CA-125 and Standard Definitions of Progression of Ovarian Cancer in the Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Cyclophosphamide
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. T. Taylor and D. Haverstick
Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer)
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 19, 2005; 97(2): 151 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. J.S. Rustin
Can We Now Agree to Use the Same Definition to Measure Response According to CA-125?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2004; 22(20): 4035 - 4036.
[Full Text] [PDF]