© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004 Oxford University Press
NEWS |
High Expectations for Mammography At Heart of Many Breast Cancer Malpractice Cases
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Insurance claims made on behalf of neurologically impaired newborns have long been notorious for causing the greatest financial grief for American medical liability insurers. Less known is that claims generated when screening mammography misses a breast cancerthus presumably delaying its diagnosis and treatmentare consistently in second place.
Part of the reason is that the growth of screening mammography has been so phenomenal since its infancy in the 1960s that there are now more than 31 million of these examinations performed each year in the United States. Whereas this U.S. Food and Drug Administration statistic speaks to the success of many professional and advocacy groups in popularizing mammography, the most frequent defendants in breast
Related News Article in JNCI
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 430.