Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(24):1805-1806; doi:10.1093/jnci/96.24.1805
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garber, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garber, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

NEWS

Energy Boost: The Warburg Effect Returns in a New Theory of Cancer

Ken Garber

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1930, German biochemist Otto Warburg, M.D., proposed that cancer was caused by altered metabolism—deranged energy processing—in the cell. Warburg, winner of a Nobel Prize in 1931, is now considered by many to be the greatest biochemist of the first half of the 20th century. His cancer theory, though, mostly fell on deaf ears. Altered metabolism "may be a symptom of [cancer], but not the primary cause," wrote fellow biochemist and Nobelist Hans Krebs, M.D., Ph.D., echoing the majority viewpoint. Warburg went to his grave in 1970 insisting he was right, but for 30 years his cancer theory appeared to be buried along with its originator.

Now Warburg's theory is enjoying a resurrection. Two prominent cancer biologists contend that a shift in energy production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis—the so-called "Warburg effect"—is a fundamental property of cancer cells, not just a byproduct of the cell's transformation into cancer. "We think . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Power Supply

Into the Clinic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. A. Stein, C.-y. Chang, D. A. Kazmin, J. Way, T. Schroeder, M. Wergin, M. W. Dewhirst, and D. P. McDonnell
Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha} Is Critical for the Growth of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 68(21): 8805 - 8812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. A. Mayr, D. Meierhofer, F. Zimmermann, R. Feichtinger, C. Kogler, M. Ratschek, N. Schmeller, W. Sperl, and B. Kofler
Loss of Complex I due to Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Renal Oncocytoma
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 14(8): 2270 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
E. Fosslien
Cancer Morphogenesis: Role of Mitochondrial Failure
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2008; 38(4): 307 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Golman, R. i. Zandt, M. Lerche, R. Pehrson, and J. H. Ardenkjaer-Larsen
Metabolic Imaging by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Imaging for In vivo Tumor Diagnosis.
Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10855 - 10860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. J.Kim, K. Chandrasekaran, and W. F.Morgan
Mitochondrial dysfunction, persistently elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and radiation-induced genomic instability: a review
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 361 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. E. Hatch, M. Hudson, M. L. Seto, M. L. Cunningham, and M. Bothwell
Intracellular Retention, Degradation, and Signaling of Glycosylation-deficient FGFR2 and Craniosynostosis Syndrome-associated FGFR2C278F
J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 27292 - 27305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
E. Gottlieb
What Does Bioenergetics Have to Do with Cancer?
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2006; 2006(1): 341 - 344.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Isidoro, E. Casado, A. Redondo, P. Acebo, E. Espinosa, A. M. Alonso, P. Cejas, D. Hardisson, J. A. Fresno Vara, C. Belda-Iniesta, et al.
Breast carcinomas fulfill the Warburg hypothesis and provide metabolic markers of cancer prognosis
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2005; 26(12): 2095 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]