Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(21):1639-1640; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh309
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCready, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCready, D. R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

RESPONSE: Re: Influence of the New AJCC Breast Cancer Staging System on Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and False-Negative Rates

David R. McCready

Correspondence to: David R. McCready, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Breast Site Group, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave., University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (e-mail: david.mccready@uhn.on.ca)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The comments from Dr. Atkins support our paper (1) and are appreciated. There is a general agreement that the American Joint Committee on . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Correspondence

Re: Influence of the New AJCC Breast Cancer Staging System on Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity and False-Negative Rates
Carl D. Atkins
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1639. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]