Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(21):1573-1574; doi:10.1093/jnci/96.21.1573
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

NEWS

Good Drug, Bad Luck: Business, Regulatory Issues Can Create Obstacles for Drug Development

Bruce Goldman

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Anybody involved with cancer knows that bad things happen to good people. Sometimes bad things happen to good cancer drugs, too, for reasons ranging from regulatory red tape to intellectual property constraints. The stories of two drugs—one an oral chemotherapy, the other a bone-seeking radiopharmaceutical—show how regulatory or licensing barriers can block a promising compound's path.

UFT: When One Plus One Equals Zero

At the annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in June 2004, Norman Wolmark, M.D., had good news: results from a large trial of several years' duration, in which an oral chemotherapy drug called UFT (uracil/tegafur) was tested in some 1,600 patients with colorectal cancer whose primary tumors had been removed. Wolmark, chairman of the Department of Human Oncology Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh and the study's lead investigator, reported that an oral regimen of UFT plus another drug, leucovorin, was as effective as the existing standard treatment—intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Quadramet: the Patients Versus the Patents

Common Sense


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?