Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(10):737-738; doi:10.1093/jnci/96.10.737
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hede, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hede, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

NEWS

When 50 Percent Is Not the Same as a Coin Toss: Study Examines Decisions Made Based on Statistics

Karyn Hede

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

When a diner orders escargot at a French restaurant and is shocked to discover a plate covered with snails, she can always send them back. But when chemotherapy is on the menu, she can only choose once. And many times, patients do not understand what is really on the menu, according to a study that shows that simple variations in how doctors present survival data can lead to large differences in the perceived benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. This misperception of risk can change whether a patient chooses to undergo chemotherapy, and that should be a cause for alarm, the authors concluded.

"The bottom line is that a very simple statistical manipulation can have a rather dramatic impact on the decisions that people make," said Jamie . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?