Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(6):487; doi:10.1093/jnci/95.6.487
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 6, 487, March 19, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography

Daniel B. Kopans

Correspondence to: Daniel B. Kopans, M.D., F.A.C.R., Avon Foundation Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Center, Suite 240, 15 Parkman St., Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: kopans.daniel@mgh.harvard.edu).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

I was surprised to read that Ernster et al. (1) thought that they were the first to discover that the rate of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) increases with age while DCIS accounts for a progressively smaller percentage of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?