Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002 94(6):463; doi:10.1093/jnci/94.6.463
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Weisenburger, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Weisenburger, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 6, 463, March 20, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

RESPONSE: Re: Familial Multiple Myeloma: a Family Study and Review of the Literature

Henry T. Lynch, Warren G. Sanger, Samuel Pirruccello, Brigid Quinn-Laquer, Dennis D. Weisenburger

Affiliations of authors: Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.

Correspondence to: Henry T. Lynch, M.D., Creighton University School of Medicine, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 719 North 24th St., Omaha, NE 68102 (e-mail: htlynch@creighton.edu).

My colleagues and I are deeply appreciative of the letter from Kari Hemminki calling to our attention reference material dealing with familial risk for multiple myeloma (MM) that was not included in our manuscript (1). This work from Sweden is truly . . . [Full Text of this Article]

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?