Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002 94(4):309-310; doi:10.1093/jnci/94.4.309
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perneger, T. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Perneger, T. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 4, 309-310, February 20, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

RESPONSE: Re: Sex, Smoking, and Cancer: a Reappraisal

Thomas V. Perneger

Correspondence to: Thomas V. Perneger, M.D., Ph.D., Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, and Quality of Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (e-mail: thomas.perneger@hcuge.ch).

I thank Drs. Risch and Miller, and Dr. Zang, for their comments. Both letters defend the substance of the published findings, i.e., that women smokers are in fact at higher risk of lung cancer than are male smokers. This may be true, but it is beside . . . [Full Text of this Article]

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?