© 2002 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 17, 1269-1270,
September 4, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
NEWS |
Cancer Registries: Should Informed Consent Be Required?
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The United Kingdom boasts the worlds largest national cancer registry system. Over the last 40 years, it claims to have collected, checked, cross-linked, stored, and analyzed identifiable data on millions of patients without ever once breaching patient confidentiality. But a legal question mark now hangs over the system and, according to one view, it is in breach of data protection law.
The situation has set the stage for a debate among cancer registries, politicians, patient groups, medical ethicists, and the government as to whether registration should be mandatory or based on informed consent. Five working groups are investigating different options.
The U.K. Association of Cancer Registries (UKACR) is campaigning for a statutory system similar to the ones operating
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Dixon-Woods, B. Young, and E. Ross Researching chronic childhood illness: the example of childhood cancer Chronic Illness, September 1, 2006; 2(3): 165 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Surman, S. Bonellie, J. Chalmers, A. Colver, H. Dolk, K. Hemming, A. King, J. J. Kurinczuk, J. Parkes, and M. J. Platt UKCP: a collaborative network of cerebral palsy registers in the United Kingdom J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 148 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lucassen, M. Parker, and R. Wheeler Implications of data protection legislation for family history BMJ, February 4, 2006; 332(7536): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


