Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002 94(10):708-710; doi:10.1093/jnci/94.10.708
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fintor, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fintor, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 10, 708-710, May 15, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


NEWS

New Uniform Population Standard Better Reflects U.S. Cancer Burden

Lou Fintor

When new U.S. cancer incidence and mortality rates are compared with older data, the differences appear startling: 22% more rectal cancer and an 18% increase in female breast cancer.

But rather than revealing an abrupt and staggering surge in cancer cases, they instead reflect a decade-long federal effort to improve cancer statistical data reporting by adjusting rates to a single new population "standard" based on the year 2000 U.S. census.

"Unless you understand that this reflects a change in the statistical methodology rather than an increase in cancer rates, there will be confusion, disappointment, and concern that something has happened to our continuing progress against cancer," said Brenda K. Edwards, Ph.D., associate director of the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance Research Program.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Dr. Brenda K. Edwards

 
"We want to understand, confess, and educate, but we don’t want people to be derailed by focusing on increases . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Rates Appear Higher

Comparing Apples to Apples

Varying Foreign Standards

Data Improvements Under Way


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?