Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(22):1683-1684; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.22.1683-a
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newman, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 22, 1683-1684, November 21, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

NEWS

Report Examines Management of Suspicious Breast Lesions

Laura Newman

The optimal work-up and diagnosis for suspicious breast lesions remains a highly contentious area of debate, especially with the proliferation of new imaging studies, potential risk factors, and shifting pathological schemes.

Yet well-designed reviews of the best available studies on these dimensions do not guide clinical strategy. Instead, these rigorous reviews prove most useful in flagging methodological weaknesses and setting the stage for establishing new research priorities.

Such was the case with an evidence report sponsored by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to examine controversial . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Inconsistent Reporting

Specific Pathological Findings

Sentinel Node Biopsy

Applying the Report


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?