Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(22):1679-1680; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.22.1679
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baltic, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baltic, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 22, 1679-1680, November 21, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

NEWS

Conference Addresses Potential Flaws in Peer Review Process

Scott Baltic

The skirmish over the quality of data in mammography screening trials brings to light frustrations about the methodological flaws that some experts believe have muddied the research to date. Discussion at the 4th International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication in Barcelona in September was unsparing in its analysis of how a system that is intended to ensure that only high-quality medical research is published often falls short.

Douglas Altman, D.Sc., of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?