Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(10):791-792; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.10.791-a
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schatzkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flood, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schatzkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flood, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 10, 791-792, May 16, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Response

Arthur Schatzkin, Andrew Flood

Affiliation of authors: Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Correspondence to: Arthur Schatzkin, M.D., Dr.P.H., National Institutes of Health, Executive Plaza North, 6130 Executive Blvd., Rm. 211, Rockville, MD 20852. (e-mail: Schatzkina@exchange.nih.gov).

Nelson et al. argue that, even though some recent observational (1) and experimental (2) epidemiologic studies have yielded null results, pessimism about diet and cancer is unwarranted because colorectal cancer incidence has been declining in the United States. Ecologic (aggregate) studies, including those of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?