© 2000 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 16, 1292-1294,
August 16, 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
NEWS |
Lung Project Update Raises Issue Of Overdiagnosing Patients
Several screening tests are becoming popular based on only short-term survival data and with no evidence that they reduce the rate of late-stage cancers and cancer-specific mortality. An extended follow-up study of the Mayo Lung Project in this issue of the Journal and a recent outcomes analysis of 20 major cancers show no overall mortality reduction despite increases in survival from the date of diagnosis. The authors of both papers say that there is a very real concern about harm that must be addressed, a possibility that often gets short shrift.
The 20-year Mayo Lung Project extended follow-up study (p. 1308) suggests that a phenomenon known as overdiagnosis finding disease that may be clinically irrelevantwas a major factor in explaining the survival/mortality differential between a group of patients aggressively screened for lung
Overdiagnosis Bias
Limitations of Survival Analysis
Leveling With Patients
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. W. Grannis Jr. Lung Cancer Overdiagnosis Bias : "The Gyanousa Am Loose!" Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 322 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. S. Miettinen and C. I. Henschke CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Coping with Nihilistic Recommendations Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 592 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

