© 2000 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 14, 1114-1115,
July 19, 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
EDITORIAL |
Familial Aggregation: Sorting Susceptibility From Shared Environment
Correspondence to: Gloria M. Petersen, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., S.W., Rochester, MN 55905 (e-mail: peterg@mayo.edu).
The contribution of family-based studies to elucidating the etiology of cancer has not been as widely appreciated as deserved. During the past decade, headlines have repeatedly trumpeted the discoveries of many cancer genes. In a number of cases, the discoveries have been translated to the clinic to improve cancer risk assessment and more precisely to devise potential interventions (15). In the laboratory, moreover, new avenues have been opened to characterizing the functional role of these genes (6). However, none of this would have been possible without the painstaking research over many years by hundreds of epidemiologists, clinicians, and genetic epidemiologists. They have labored to piece together the
REFERENCES
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. W. Mohrenweiser Genetic Variation and Exposure Related Risk Estimation: Will Toxicology Enter a New Era? DNA Repair and Cancer as a Paradigm Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 136 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Hemminki and X Li Familial liver and gall bladder cancer: a nationwide epidemiological study from Sweden Gut, April 1, 2003; 52(4): 592 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

