Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on June 9, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(12):844-845; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp170
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2009.
NEWS |
New Trial Data Do Not End the PSA Screening Debate
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
To screen or not to screen?
For prostate cancer, that is still the question, despite the release this spring of mortality data from two large trials that asked whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing reduces the risk of dying from prostate cancer. In the United States, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial found no mortality benefit for PSA screening after 7–10 years. Across the Atlantic, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) reported a 20% mortality benefit after 10 years of PSA screening. Both studies were published in the March 26, 2009, New England Journal of Medicine.
The data generated conflicting responses. The American Cancer Society (ACS) continued to not recommend routine screening. Instead, the ACS endorses shared decision making, with men and their physicians discussing the pros and cons of PSA screening before deciding on the blood test. The American Urological Association,
First Draft
European Trial
Moving Ahead