Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on May 12, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(10):698-699; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp098
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.
EDITORIALS |
Small Beginnings: Do They Matter? The Importance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Early Breast Cancer
Affiliation of authors: Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Correspondence to: Nancy E. Davidson, MD, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5150 Centre Ave, Ste 500, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 (e-mail: davidsonne@upmc.edu).
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In the era of tailored therapy, the evaluation of systemic treatment of breast cancer has been increasingly dominated by consideration of biological features of the tumor and the host. Established breast cancer prognostic factors—those that determine natural history of breast cancer—include axillary nodal status, tumor size, histological grade, hormone receptor status, HER-2 expression, and presence of lymphovascular invasion. These factors often inform decisions about whether to use adjuvant systemic therapy. In contrast, predictive markers like expression of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 protein are powerful tools to select certain types of therapy. Techniques to examine a myriad of genomic, transcriptional, or proteomic factors simultaneously, so-called omics, currently dominate this field.
In this molecular age, it
Related Article in JNCI
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 695.