Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(8):521-523; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/8/521    most recent
djn098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esteva, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hortobagyi, G. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esteva, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hortobagyi, G. N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

EDITORIALS

Can Early Response Assessment Guide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?

Francisco J. Esteva, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

Affiliation of authors: Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Correspondence to: Francisco J. Esteva, MD, PhD, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd—Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: festeva@mdanderson.org).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Randomized clinical trials conducted over the last three decades have shown that systemic adjuvant therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and death in patients with early-stage breast cancer. In patients with locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, the use of chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant or preoperative approach) is the standard of care. A clinical and/or radiological response is achieved in most patients, and this response facilitates optimal surgery and radiation therapy. The success of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer, combined with emerging data on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, led to studies investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy among women with operable breast cancer. Randomized clinical trials of adjuvant vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage operable breast cancer showed no difference in disease-free or overall survival rates. Potential advantages of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

Neoadjuvant Vinorelbine–Capecitabine Versus Docetaxel–Doxorubicin–Cyclophosphamide in Early Nonresponsive Breast Cancer: Phase III Randomized GeparTrio Trial
Gunter von Minckwitz, Sherko Kümmel, Petra Vogel, Claus Hanusch, Holger Eidtmann, Jörn Hilfrich, Bernd Gerber, Jens Huober, Serban Dan Costa, Christian Jackisch, Sibylle Loibl, Keyur Mehta, and Manfred Kaufmann On behalf of the German Breast Group
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 542-551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 519. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]