Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on March 25, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(7):459-461; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn092
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2008.
NEWS |
Anthracycline Therapy May Be Avoidable in Early Breast Cancer, New Studies Suggest
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Several meta-analyses have shown that the overall outlook for women diagnosed with early breast cancer has improved in recent decades, with better overall survival and fewer relapses. Anthracycline-based therapy, the backbone of early breast cancer treatment, has undoubtedly been a major driving force in those improvements. Yet the drugs also cause long-term heart problems and secondary leukemia in some patients. Researchers are therefore trying to identify equally effective regimens that lack those side effects.
Nonanthracycline regimens that have less long-term toxicity may provide equal clinical benefit in terms of prolonged progression-free and overall survival, according to data presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in December 2007. Given those results and a recently published meta-analysis, some experts are calling for a change in the standard of care: leaving
Anthracycline Alternative?
Anthracycline Benefit Restricted to Subset of HER2