Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on October 28, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(21):1494-1496; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn402
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2008.
NEWS |
Watchful Waiting Beats Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Early Prostate Cancer
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Sometimes not treating a patient with cancer may be the best treatment—at least for early prostate cancer, a new study indicates. A retrospective analysis of nearly 20,000 men aged 66 years and older showed that men without aggressive disease who took the "watchful waiting" approach did as well as or better than those who took androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
ADT is most often used as a palliative treatment for advanced prostate cancer or in patients with early disease who are at high risk of progression. Its routine use in other early-stage patients is frequent but controversial. Commonly prescribed ADT drugs include the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, such as leuprolide and buserelin, and anti-androgens such as flutamide and nilutamide.
In the recent study, Grace Lu-Yao, Ph.D., of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, and colleagues looked at survival rates in more than 19,000 men on Medicare who had not
Who Benefits?
ADT Use Prevalent
Reasons for Overuse