Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(17):1264; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn237
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.
CORRESPONDENCE |
Re: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Dose Prescription, Recording, and Delivery: Patterns of Variability Among Institutions and Treatment Planning Systems
Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (JMG, YX); Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (WJC)
Correspondence to: James M. Galvin, DSc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 South 11th St, Philadelphia, PA (e-mail: james.galvin@jeffersonhospital.org).
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Das et al. (1) assert that their results "suggest that it may not be meaningful to compare clinical outcomes among intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patients treated at different institutions." The research missions of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and other multicenter research organizations rely on the
Response to this Correspondence
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1265-1266.