| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2008.
IN THIS ISSUE
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
False-Positive Results in Cancer Epidemiology
False-positive results, or results that cannot be confirmed in subsequent investigations, are an unfortunate yet inherent outcome of observational epidemiologic studies. Nevertheless, these results are often assumed to be scientifically valid and applicable to the general public and are often sensationally portrayed by the media and overinterpreted by the study authors themselves. In a Commentary, Boffetta et al. (p. 988) highlight some examples of likely false-positive findings in cancer epidemiology and discuss the sources of these types of results. They suggest guidelines and principles for analyzing and reporting results of epidemiologic studies in an effort to provide an epistemic and methodological context for authors, readers, and the press to aid
Addition of SNPs to Models of Breast Cancer Risk
Reduction of Iron Stores and Cancer Risk
Cancer Mortality and Educational Attainment
Medicare Managed Care and a Diagnosis of Cancer
Cell Cycle Regulator in Prostate Cancer Invasion and Metastasis
Related Articles in JNCI
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1037-1041.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 988-995.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1003-1012.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1013-1021.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 996-1002.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 1022-1036.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 978-979.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 976-977.