Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on July 2, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(16):1116-1119; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp186
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/16/1116    most recent
djp186v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2009.

COMMENTARY

Improving the Biomarker Pipeline to Develop and Evaluate Cancer Screening Tests

Stuart G. Baker

Affiliation of author: Biometry Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to: Stuart G. Baker, ScD, National Cancer Institute, EPN 3131, 6130 Executive Blvd MSC 7354, Bethesda, MD 20892-7354 (e-mail: sb16i{at}nih.gov).

The biomarker pipeline to develop and evaluate cancer screening tests has three stages: identification of promising biomarkers for the early detection of cancer, initial evaluation of biomarkers for cancer screening, and definitive evaluation of biomarkers for cancer screening. Statistical and biological issues to improve this pipeline are discussed. Although various recommendations, such as identifying cases based on clinical symptoms, keeping biomarker tests simple, and adjusting for postscreening noise, have been made previously, they are not widely known. New recommendations include more frequent specimen collection to help identify promising biomarkers and the use of the paired availability design with interval cases (symptomatic cancers detected in the interval after screening) for initial evaluation of biomarkers for cancer screening.

Manuscript received November 25, 2008; revised May 26, 2009; accepted May 29, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Article in JNCI

In this Issue
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 1101. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.