Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(8):592-600; doi:10.1093/jnci/djk130
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riechelmann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krzyzanowska, M. K.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

Potential Drug Interactions and Duplicate Prescriptions Among Cancer Patients

Rachel P. Riechelmann, Ian F. Tannock, Lisa Wang, Everardo D. Saad, Nathan A. Taback, Monika K. Krzyzanowska

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Medical Oncology and Hematology (RPR, IFT, MKK) and Biostatistics (LW), Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dendrix, Ltd, Sao Paulo, Brazil (EDS); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (NAT)

Correspondence to: Monika K. Krzyzanowska, MD, MPH, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Ste 5-227, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada (e-mail: monika.krzyzanowska{at}uhn.on.ca).

Background: Cancer patients receive numerous medications, including antineoplastic agents, drugs for supportive care, and medications for comorbid illnesses. Therefore, they are at risk for drug interactions and duplicate prescribing.

Methods: A questionnaire eliciting information on demographics and medications taken in the previous 4 weeks was given to adult outpatients receiving systemic anticancer therapy for solid tumors. The Drug Interaction Facts software, version 4.0, was used to identify potential drug interactions and to classify them by level of severity (major, moderate, or minor) and the strength of scientific evidence for them (using categories [1–5] of decreasing certainty). Summary statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: The survey was completed by 405 patients. We observed 276 potential drug interactions, and at least one potential interaction was identified in 109 patients (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 23% to 31%). Of the potential interactions, 25 (9%) were classified as major and 211 (77%) as moderate. Nearly half (49%) of potential interactions were supported by level 1 or 2 scientific evidence. Most potential drug interactions (87%) involved non-anticancer agents such as warfarin, antihypertensive drugs, corticosteroids, and anticonvulsants, but some (n = 36, 13%) involved antineoplastic agents. In multivariable analysis, increased risk of receiving drug combinations in which there were potential drug interactions was associated with receipt of increasing numbers of drugs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4 per additional drug, 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.58, P<.001 from the Wald chi-square test), type of medication (drugs to treat comorbid conditions versus supportive care medications only; OR = 8.6, 95% CI = 2.9 to 25, P<.001), and the presence of brain tumors. Thirty-two (8%) patients were exposed to duplicate medications, most often corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, or benzodiazepines.

Conclusion: Potential drug interactions were common among cancer patients and most often involved medications to treat comorbid conditions. Duplicate medications were infrequent.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Cancer patients are often prescribed many medications concurrently; in addition to chemotherapeutic agents, they may receive drugs to treat non-neoplastic conditions as well as medicines for supportive care. The extent to which they are exposed to adverse drug interactions is unknown.

Study design

Information on individual exposure to various medications in a random sample of an outpatient population was collected by questionnaire, and potential drug interactions were identified using a software program that accessed published data on drug interactions.

Contribution

Potential interactions were identified in 27% of patients and classified according to severity, level of scientific evidence supporting the interaction, type of medications involved, type of cancer, and other parameters. Most of the potential interactions involved medications to treat comorbid conditions.

Implications

The results suggest the importance of further studies to determine the frequency of adverse drug interactions in cancer patients.

Limitations

The study was not designed to determine how often the potential drug interactions identified actually resulted in adverse clinical consequences for patients.

 
Manuscript received July 12, 2006; revised February 7, 2007; accepted March 19, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Find additional patient-related information at:

Cancer Patients at Risk of Drug Interactions

Editorial about this Article

Patient Safety in Cancer Care: A Time for Action
Peter G. Norton and G. Ross Baker
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 579-580. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 577. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Press Release: Cancer Patients Are at High Risk for Potential Drug Interactions
Liz Savage
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 577. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. Yano, D. Tani, K. Watanabe, H. Tsukamoto, T. Igarashi, T. Nakamura, and M. Masada
Evaluation of Potential Interaction Between Vinorelbine and Clarithromycin
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2009; 43(3): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. E. Walsh, K. S. Dodd, K. Seetharaman, D. W. Roblin, L. J. Herrinton, A. Von Worley, G. Naheed Usmani, D. Baer, and J. H. Gurwitz
Medication Errors Among Adults and Children With Cancer in the Outpatient Setting
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2009; 27(6): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C.-M. Wong, Y. Ko, and A. Chan
Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions Between Oral Anticancer Agents and Nonanticancer Agents: Profiling and Comparison of Two Drug Compendia
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2008; 42(12): 1737 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
M. H Hanigan, B. L dela Cruz, D. M Thompson, K. C Farmer, and P. J Medina
Use of prescription and nonprescription medications and supplements by cancer patients during chemotherapy: questionnaire validation
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 123 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
F. Xu
Caution in prescribing antidepressants for patients with cancer
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2008; 65(8): 700 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A J Munro
Hidden danger, obvious opportunity: error and risk in the management of cancer
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 955 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. G. Norton and G. R. Baker
Patient Safety in Cancer Care: A Time for Action
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 18, 2007; 99(8): 579 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.