Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(3):223-235; doi:10.1093/jnci/djk031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tosato, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tosato, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Effect of Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 on Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 Production by Bone Marrow Stromal Cells and Hematopoiesis

Takayuki Nakayama, Noriko Mutsuga, Giovanna Tosato

Affiliations of authors: Basic Research Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (TN, GT); Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (NM)

Correspondence to: Giovanna Tosato, MD, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bldg. 10, Rm. 12C205, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: tosatog{at}mail.nih.gov).

BACKGROUND: Reduction of intramedullary hematopoiesis and the development of myelofibrosis and splenic hematopoiesis are frequent complications of clonal myeloid disorders that cause severe morbidity and death and present a therapeutic challenge. However, the pathogenesis of these complications is still unknown. We evaluated the effect of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), the level of which is elevated in patients with clonal myeloid disorders, on bone marrow stromal cell expression of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), a chemokine that is essential for normal hematopoiesis.

METHODS: Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction analysis, immunoblot analysis, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to examine effects of human recombinant FGF-2 exposure on SDF-1 expression in mouse stromal MS-5 and S-17 cells. Cocultures of human CD34-positive peripheral blood stem cells or mouse pre–B DW34 cells with mouse stromal cells were used to characterize the functional relevance of the effects of FGF-2 on SDF-1 expression. The in vivo hematologic effects of FGF-2 were determined by systemic administration to mice (n = 10). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS: FGF-2 reduced constitutive SDF-1 mRNA expression and secretion in stromal cells (SDF-1 levels in supernatants: MS-5 cells cultured for 3 days in medium only versus in medium with FGF-2, 95.4 ng/mL versus 22.2 ng/mL, difference = 73.2 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 60.52 to 85.87 ng/mL; P = .002, two-sided Student's t test; S-17 cultured in medium only versus in medium with FGF-2, 203.53 ng/mL versus 32.36 ng/mL, difference = 171.17 ng/mL, 95% CI = 161.8 to 180.6 ng/mL; P<.001). These effects of FGF-2 were reversible. FGF-2 compromised stromal cell support of the growth and survival of pre–B DW34 and myeloid lineage cells, and these effects were reversed in part by exogenous recombinant SDF-1{alpha} (rSDF-1{alpha}) (DW34 pre–B cells recovery on S-17 stromal cells, expressed as a percentage of DW34 cells recovered from medium only: with FGF-2 versus without FGF-2, 27.6% versus 100%, difference = 72.4%, 95% CI = 45.34% to 99.51%, P = .008; with FGF-2 plus rSDF1 versus with FGF-2 only, 60.3% versus 27.6%, difference = 32.7%, 95% CI = 9.35% to 56.08%, P = .034; fold increase in number of myeloid lineage cells after culture on S-17 stromal cells: with FGF-2 versus without FGF-2, 0.25-fold versus 3.8-fold, difference = 3.55-fold, 95% CI = 2.66- to 4.44-fold, P<.001; recovery of myeloid cells on S-17 stromal cells, expressed as a percentage of myeloid cells recovered from medium only: FGF-2 plus rSDF-1{alpha} versus FGF-2 only, 76.5% versus 32.4%, difference = 44.1%, 95% CI = 32.58% to 55.68%, P<.001). Administration of FGF-2 to mice reversibly reduced bone marrow levels of SDF-1 and cellularity and induced immature myeloid cell mobilization, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and splenomegaly.

CONCLUSIONS: Systemic administration of FGF-2 in mice disrupts normal bone marrow hematopoiesis in part through reduced expression of SDF-1. Thus, endogenous FGF-2 may represent a potential therapeutic target in clonal myeloid disorders characterized by bone marrow failure.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Defective bone marrow hematopoiesis is a serious complication of clonal myeloid disorders. Patients with these disorders have elevated levels of FGF-2 in their bone marrow. The role of FGF-2 in the pathogenesis of bone marrow failure is unclear.

Study design

In vitro studies in mouse and human cells and an in vivo study in a mouse model.

Contribution

FGF-2 was shown to inhibit bone marrow stromal cell expression of SDF-1, a critical regulator of hematopoiesis, and systemic administration of FGF-2 in mice disrupted normal bone marrow hematopoiesis in part by decreasing SDF-1 expression.

Implications

FGF-2 may represent a potential therapeutic target for bone marrow failure in clonal myeloid disorders.

Limitations

It is not known whether systemic administration of FGF-2 to humans affects SDF-1 expression or whether abnormally high levels of endogenous FGF-2 contribute to the pathogenesis of bone marrow failure in patients with clonal myeloid disorders.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.