Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on December 11, 2007
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(24):1845-1853; doi:10.1093/jnci/djm246
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v100,p226)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/24/1845    most recent
djm246v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jakesz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jakesz, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

Extended Adjuvant Therapy With Anastrozole Among Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Results From the Randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a

Raimund Jakesz, Richard Greil, Michael Gnant, Marianne Schmid, Werner Kwasny, Ernst Kubista, Brigitte Mlineritsch, Christoph Tausch, Michael Stierer, Friedrich Hofbauer, Karl Renner, Christian Dadak, Ernst Rücklinger, Hellmut Samonigg
On behalf of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Surgery (RJ, MG, ER) and Gynecology (EK, CD), Vienna Medical University, Vienna, Austria; Third Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria (RG, BM); First Medical Department, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria (M. Schmid, HS); Department of Surgery, Wiener Neustadt Hospital, Wiener Neustadt, Austria (WK); Department of Surgery, Sisters of Mercy Hospital, Linz, Austria (CT); Department of Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (M. Stierer); Department of Surgery, Oberpullendorf Hospital, Oberpullendorf, Austria (FH); Department of Surgery, Social Medical Center Sozialmedizinisches zentrum Ost, Vienna, Austria (KR)

Correspondence to: Raimund Jakesz, MD, Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, Vienna A-1090, Austria (e-mail: raimund.jakesz{at}meduniwien.ac.at).

Background: Clinical trial data have shown that among breast cancer patients who were disease free after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen, further extended treatment with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole reduces breast cancer recurrence. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of extended adjuvant therapy with another aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, for 3 years among women who had completed 5 years of adjuvant therapy.

Methods: Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a is an extension of ABCSG Trial 6, in which hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal patients received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide, for the first 2 years of therapy. For ABCSG Trial 6a, patients who were disease free at the end of Trial 6 were randomly assigned to receive either 3 years of anastrozole or no further treatment. Efficacy data were analyzed with the use of a Cox proportional hazards regression model with two-sided P values and Kaplan–Meier curves, and tolerability data were estimated using logistic regression analysis with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: ABCSG Trial 6a included 856 patients. At a median follow-up of 62.3 months, women who received anastrozole (n = 387) had a statistically significantly reduced risk of recurrence (locoregional recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or distant metastasis) compared with women who received no further treatment (n = 469; hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.96, P = .031). Anastrozole was well tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: These data confirm the benefit of extending adjuvant tamoxifen therapy beyond 5 years with anastrozole compared with no further treatment. Further research is required to define the optimum length of extended adjuvant therapy and to investigate the possibility of tailoring this period to suit different disease types.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

A large clinical trial found that women who received 5 years of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen experienced a 42% reduction in the risk of recurrence compared with women who received placebo. However, early stoppage of that trial precluded assessments of the long-term efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant treatment.

Study design

Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a was a prospective randomized open-label clinical trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole for 3 years with no further treatment among patients who were disease free at the end of ABCSG Trial 6, which found that adjuvant tamoxifen plus the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide was not superior to adjuvant tamoxifen alone in hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Contribution

At a median follow-up of more than 5 years, extended adjuvant therapy with 3 years of anastrozole after successful completion of 5 years of tamoxifen reduced the risk of recurrence by 38% compared with no further treatment. Anastrozole was well tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported.

Implications

The more manageable side effect profile of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen may allow the duration of adjuvant treatment to extend beyond the 5-year period recommended for tamoxifen.

Limitations

A prerandomization procedure was used to randomly assign all eligible patients in ABCSG Trial 6 (i.e., all those who remained in the trial and disease free) to an arm of Trial 6a to ensure that there would be no gap in treatment between completion of 5 years of primary adjuvant therapy and commencement of the extended study.

 
Manuscript received August 28, 2007; revised October 2, 2007; accepted October 30, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Extended Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer—How Much Is Enough?
Tatiana M. Prowell and Vered Stearns
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1825-1827. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related Article in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1821. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. F. Hayes, V. Stearns, J. Rae, D. Flockhart, and on behalf of the Consortium on Breast Cancer Pharm
A Model Citizen? Is Tamoxifen More Effective Than Aromatase Inhibitors if We Pick the Right Patients?
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 7, 2008; 100(9): 610 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
S. Aebi and M. Rabaglio
Overview of Current Approaches to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 9 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. M. Prowell and V. Stearns
Extended Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer How Much Is Enough?
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 19, 2007; 99(24): 1825 - 1827.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.