Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(8):529-534; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj131
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coltman, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coltman, C. A., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Assessing Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

Ian M. Thompson, Donna Pauler Ankerst, Chen Chi, Phyllis J. Goodman, Catherine M. Tangen, M. Scott Lucia, Ziding Feng, Howard L. Parnes, Charles A. Coltman, Jr.

Affiliations of authors: Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IMT); The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (DPA, CC, PJG, CMT, ZF); University of Colorado, Denver, CO (MSL); Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (HLP); Southwest Oncology Group, San Antonio, TX (CAC)

Correspondence to: Ian Thompson, MD, Department of Urology, UTHSCSA, University of Texas HSC at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229 (e-mail: thompsoni{at}uthscsa.edu).

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is the primary method used to diagnose prostate cancer in the United States. Methods to integrate other risk factors associated with prostate cancer into individualized risk prediction are needed. We used prostate biopsy data from men who participated in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) to develop a predictive model of prostate cancer. Methods: We included 5519 men from the placebo group of the PCPT who underwent prostate biopsy, had at least one PSA measurement and a digital rectal examination (DRE) performed during the year before the biopsy, and had at least two PSA measurements performed during the 3 years before the prostate biopsy. Logistic regression was used to model the risk of prostate cancer and high-grade disease associated with age at biopsy, race, family history of prostate cancer, PSA level, PSA velocity, DRE result, and previous prostate biopsy. Risk equations were created from the estimated logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 1211 (21.9%) men were diagnosed with prostate cancer by prostate biopsy. Variables that predicted prostate cancer included higher PSA level, positive family history of prostate cancer, and abnormal DRE result, whereas a previous negative prostate biopsy was associated with reduced risk. Neither age at biopsy nor PSA velocity contributed independent prognostic information. Higher PSA level, abnormal DRE result, older age at biopsy, and African American race were predictive for high-grade disease (Gleason score ≥7) whereas a previous negative prostate biopsy reduced this risk. Conclusions: This predictive model allows an individualized assessment of prostate cancer risk and risk of high-grade disease for men who undergo a prostate biopsy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. Vener, C. Derecho, J. Baden, H. Wang, Y. Rajpurohit, J. Skelton, J. Mehrotra, S. Varde, D. Chowdary, W. Stallings, et al.
Development of a Multiplexed Urine Assay for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 874 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. J Wilt
Commentary: controversies in NICE guidance on prostate cancer
BMJ, March 15, 2008; 336(7644): 612 - 614.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Hemminki, J. Sundquist, and J. Lorenzo Bermejo
Familial Risks for Cancer as the Basis for Evidence-Based Clinical Referral and Counseling
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. V. D'Amico
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and PSA Velocity: Competitors or Collaborators in the Prediction of Curable and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 823 - 824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Ulmert, A. M. Serio, M. F. O'Brien, C. Becker, J. A. Eastham, P. T. Scardino, T. Bjork, G. Berglund, A. J. Vickers, and H. Lilja
Long-Term Prediction of Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Velocity Is Predictive but Does Not Improve the Predictive Accuracy of a Single PSA Measurement 15 Years or More Before Cancer Diagnosis in a Large, Representative, Unscreened Population
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 835 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Connolly, A. Black, A. Gavin, P. F. Keane, and L. J. Murray
Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen Level and Risk of Prostate Cancer and Prostate-Specific Mortality: Diagnosis Is Dependent on the Intensity of Investigation
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. S. Pepe, Z. Feng, Y. Huang, G. Longton, R. Prentice, I. M. Thompson, and Y. Zheng
Integrating the Predictiveness of a Marker with Its Performance as a Classifier
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 167(3): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. D. Etzioni, D. P. Ankerst, N. S. Weiss, L. Y. T. Inoue, and I. M. Thompson
Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Useful in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer? A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 17, 2007; 99(20): 1510 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. J. Parekh, D. P. Ankerst, J. Baillargeon, B. Higgins, E. A. Platz, D. Troyer, J. Hernandez, R. J. Leach, A. Lokshin, and I. M. Thompson
Assessment of 54 Biomarkers for Biopsy-Detectable Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1966 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. W. Ross and P. W. Kantoff
Predicting Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: How Many More Nomograms Do We Need?
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3563 - 3564.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. K. Nam, A. Toi, L. H. Klotz, J. Trachtenberg, M. A.S. Jewett, S. Appu, D. A. Loblaw, L. Sugar, S. A. Narod, and M. W. Kattan
Assessing Individual Risk for Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3582 - 3588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. M. Thompson, D. Pauler Ankerst, C. Chi, P. J. Goodman, C. M. Tangen, S. M. Lippman, M. S. Lucia, H. L. Parnes, and C. A. Coltman Jr
Prediction of Prostate Cancer for Patients Receiving Finasteride: Results From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 3076 - 3081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. M. Thompson and D. P. Ankerst
Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 19, 2007; 176(13): 1853 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J Lee, T Lim, J. Uhm, K. Park, S. Park, S. Lee, J. Park, Y. Park, H. Lim, T. Sohn, et al.
Prognostic model to predict survival following first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 886 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. J. Parekh, D. P. Ankerst, and I. M. Thompson
Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels, Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics, and Prostate Cancer Prognosis: A Tocsin Calling for Prospective Studies
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 4, 2007; 99(7): 496 - 497.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. D. Etzioni, D. P. Ankerst, and I. M. Thompson
Re: Detection of Life-Threatening Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity During a Window of Curability
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 489 - 490.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. B. Carter, L. Ferrucci, A. Kettermann, P. Landis, J. Wright, J. I. Epstein, B. J. Trock, and E. J. Metter
Response: Re: Detection of Life-Threatening Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity During a Window of Curability
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 490 - 490.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. Marrelli and F. Roviello
Prognostic Score in Gastric Cancer Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 362 - 364.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. J Wilt and I. M Thompson
Clinically localised prostate cancer
BMJ, November 25, 2006; 333(7578): 1102 - 1106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. B. Carter
Assessing risk: does this patient have prostate cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 19, 2006; 98(8): 506 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.