Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(7):459-471; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Tables
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trock, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trock, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Meta-Analysis of Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk

Bruce J. Trock, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, Robert Clarke

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Urology, Oncology, and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (BJT); Departments of Oncology (LHC, RC) and Physiology and Biophysics (RC), Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Correspondence to: Bruce J. Trock, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Departments of Urology, Oncology, and Epidemiology, 600 N. Wolfe St., 149 Jefferson Bldg., Baltimore, MD 21287 (e-mail: btrock{at}jhmi.edu).

Background: High intake of soy foods has been proposed to contribute to the low breast cancer risk in Asian countries. However, results of epidemiologic studies of this association are highly variable, and experimental data suggest that soy constituents can be estrogenic and potentially risk enhancing. Thus, rigorous evaluation of available epidemiologic data is necessary before appropriate recommendations can be made, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer or those who have survived the disease. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies (12 case–control and six cohort or nested case–control) published from 1978 through 2004 that examined soy exposure and breast cancer risk. Pooled relative risk estimates were based on either the original soy exposure measure defined in each study or on an estimate of daily soy protein intake. Results: Risk estimates, levels and measures of soy exposure, and control for confounding factors varied considerably across studies. In a pooled analysis, among all women, high soy intake was modestly associated with reduced breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 0.99); the association was not statistically significant among women in Asian countries (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.12). Among the 10 studies that stratified by menopausal status the inverse association between soy exposure and breast cancer risk was somewhat stronger in premenopausal women (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.85) than in postmenopausal women (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.98); however, eight studies did not provide menopause-specific results, six of which did not support an association. When exposure was analyzed by soy protein intake in grams per day, a statistically significant association with breast cancer risk was seen only among premenopausal women (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97). Conclusions: Soy intake may be associated with a small reduction in breast cancer risk. However, this result should be interpreted with caution due to potential exposure misclassification, confounding, and lack of a dose response. Given these caveats and results of some experimental studies that suggest adverse effects from soy constituents, recommendations for high-dose isoflavone supplementation to prevent breast cancer or prevent its recurrence are premature.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Soy and Breast Cancer: The Controversy Continues
María Elena Martínez, Cynthia A. Thomson, and Stephanie A. Smith-Warner
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 430-431. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Hedelin, M. Lof, M. Olsson, H. Adlercreutz, S. Sandin, and E. Weiderpass
Dietary Phytoestrogens Are Not Associated with Risk of Overall Breast Cancer But Diets Rich in Coumestrol Are Inversely Associated with Risk of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Tumors in Swedish Women
J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 938 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Iwasaki, M. Inoue, T. Otani, S. Sasazuki, N. Kurahashi, T. Miura, S. Yamamoto, and S. Tsugane
Plasma Isoflavone Level and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer Among Japanese Women: A Nested Case-Control Study From the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1677 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. R. Khuri and D. M. Shin
Head and Neck Cancer Chemoprevention Gets a Shot in the Arm
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 345 - 347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. J. Fuhrman, B. E. Teter, M. Barba, C. Byrne, A. Cavalleri, B. J. Grant, P. J. Horvath, D. Morelli, E. Venturelli, and P. C. Muti
Equol Status Modifies the Association of Soy Intake and Mammographic Density in a Sample of Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 33 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. W. Lampe, Y. Nishino, R. M. Ray, C. Wu, W. Li, M.-G. Lin, D. L. Gao, Y. Hu, J. Shannon, H. Stalsberg, et al.
Plasma Isoflavones and Fibrocystic Breast Conditions and Breast Cancer Among Women in Shanghai, China
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2579 - 2586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
C. Duffy, K. Perez, and A. Partridge
Implications of Phytoestrogen Intake for Breast Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2007; 57(5): 260 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. E. Wood, T. C. Register, and J.M. Cline
Soy isoflavonoid effects on endogenous estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal female monkeys
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. S. Touillaud, A. C. M. Thiebaut, A. Fournier, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Dietary Lignan Intake and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 475 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. S. Touillaud, A. C.M. Thiebaut, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
No Association between Dietary Phytoestrogens and Risk of Premenopausal Breast Cancer in a French Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2574 - 2576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
S. DE ASSIS and L. HILAKIVI-CLARKE
Timing of Dietary Estrogenic Exposures and Breast Cancer Risk
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2006; 1089(1): 14 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Messina, W. McCaskill-Stevens, and J. W. Lampe
Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2006; 98(18): 1275 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-L. Low, A. M. Dunning, M. Dowsett, R. N. Luben, K.-T. Khaw, N. J. Wareham, and S. A. Bingham
Implications of Gene-Environment Interaction in Studies of Gene Variants in Breast Cancer: An Example of Dietary Isoflavones and the D356N Polymorphism in the Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Gene.
Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 8980 - 8983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. E. Wood, S. E. Appt, T. B. Clarkson, A. A. Franke, C. J. Lees, D. R. Doerge, and J. M. Cline
Effects of High-Dose Soy Isoflavones and Equol on Reproductive Tissues in Female Cynomolgus Monkeys
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ross
[In Process Citation]
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1057 - 1058.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. E. Martinez, C. A. Thomson, and S. A. Smith-Warner
Soy and breast cancer: the controversy continues.
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 5, 2006; 98(7): 430 - 431.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.