Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(2):110-115; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Endogenous Sex Hormones, Breast Cancer Risk, and Tamoxifen Response: An Ancillary Study in the NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1)

Mary S. Beattie, Joseph P. Costantino, Steven R. Cummings, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Victor G. Vogel, Mitch Dowsett, Elizabeth J. Folkerd, Walter C. Willett, Norman Wolmark, Susan E. Hankinson

Affiliations of authors: University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco, CA (MSB, SRC); University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA (VGV); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (JPC, DLW, NW); Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, England (MD, EJF); Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology; Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (WCW, SEH); California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA (SRC); Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, Boston, MA (WCW)

Correspondence to: Mary S. Beattie, MD, MAS, 1635 Divisadero St., Ste. 600, San Francisco, CA 94115 (e-mail: mary.beattie{at}ucsfmedctr.org).

Background: Prospective studies have shown an association between increased serum levels of estradiol and testosterone and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce breast cancer risk more in women with high estradiol levels than in those with lower levels. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sex hormone levels were associated with breast cancer risk and with response to tamoxifen in a high-risk population. Methods: Using a case–cohort design, we studied 135 women with postmenopausal breast cancer and 275 postmenopausal women without breast cancer who were enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1) and who had been treated with tamoxifen or placebo for 69 months. We measured estradiol, testosterone, and sex hormone–binding globulin by using radioimmunoassay in baseline plasma samples. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for invasive breast cancer were estimated for each quartile of sex hormone level using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Median plasma levels of estradiol, testosterone, and sex hormone–binding globulin were similar between the case and cohort groups. The relative risk of breast cancer for women in the placebo group was not associated with sex hormone levels (risk of estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer in women by quartile of estradiol: Q1 [lowest], RR = 1.0; Q2, RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.49 to 2.7; Q3, RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.45 to 2.61; and Q4, RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.59 to 2.82). The reduced risk of invasive breast cancer in tamoxifen-treated women compared with placebo-treated women was not associated with sex hormone levels. Conclusions: These data do not support the use of endogenous sex hormone levels to identify women who are at particularly high risk of breast cancer and who are most likely to benefit from chemoprevention with tamoxifen.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sci Transl MedHome page
N. A. Mousa, M. J. Jebrail, H. Yang, M. Abdelgawad, P. Metalnikov, J. Chen, A. R. Wheeler, and R. F. Casper
Droplet-Scale Estrogen Assays in Breast Tissue, Blood, and Serum
Science Translational Medicine, October 7, 2009; 1(1): 1ra2 - 1ra2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. R. Cummings, J. A. Tice, S. Bauer, W. S. Browner, J. Cuzick, E. Ziv, V. Vogel, J. Shepherd, C. Vachon, R. Smith-Bindman, et al.
Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 18, 2009; 101(6): 384 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. K. Neilson, C. M. Friedenreich, N. T. Brockton, and R. C. Millikan
Physical Activity and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Proposed Biologic Mechanisms and Areas for Future Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 11 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. E. Meyer zu Schwabedissen, R. G. Tirona, C. S. Yip, R. H. Ho, and R. B. Kim
Interplay between the Nuclear Receptor Pregnane X Receptor and the Uptake Transporter Organic Anion Transporter Polypeptide 1A2 Selectively Enhances Estrogen Effects in Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 68(22): 9338 - 9347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. D. Braunstein, B. D. Johnson, F. Z. Stanczyk, V. Bittner, S. L. Berga, L. Shaw, T. K. Hodgson, M. Paul-Labrador, R. Azziz, and C. N. B. Merz
Relations between Endogenous Androgens and Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women with Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4268 - 4275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Menopause IntHome page
C. L Shufelt and G. D Braunstein
Testosterone and the breast
Menopause Int, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Rock, S. W. Flatt, G. A. Laughlin, E. B. Gold, C. A. Thomson, L. Natarajan, L. A. Jones, B. J. Caan, M. L. Stefanick, R. A. Hajek, et al.
Reproductive Steroid Hormones and Recurrence-Free Survival in Women with a History of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 614 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1695 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Hormone Levels, Mammographic Density, and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1178 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
R. J Santen, N. F Boyd, R. T Chlebowski, S. Cummings, J. Cuzick, M. Dowsett, D. Easton, J. F Forbes, T. Key, S. E Hankinson, et al.
Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Kendall and M. Dowsett
Novel concepts for the chemoprevention of breast cancer through aromatase inhibition.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 827 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. H. Eliassen, S. A. Missmer, S. S. Tworoger, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Steroid Hormone Concentrations and Risk of Breast Cancer: Does the Association Vary by a Woman's Predicted Breast Cancer Risk?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2006; 24(12): 1823 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. G. Vogel and E. Taioli
Have We Found the Ultimate Risk Factor for Breast Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2006; 24(12): 1791 - 1794.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.