Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(18):1331-1334; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj362
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollingsworth, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hollenbeck, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollingsworth, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hollenbeck, B. K.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect

John M. Hollingsworth, David C. Miller, Stephanie Daignault, Brent K. Hollenbeck

Affiliation of authors: Michigan Urology Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Correspondence to: Brent K. Hollenbeck, MD, MS, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., TC 3875-0330, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330 (e-mail: bhollen{at}umich.edu).

The incidence of kidney cancer has been rising over the last two decades, especially in cases where the disease is localized. Although rates of renal surgery parallel this trend, mortality rates have continued to rise. To investigate the basis of this "treatment disconnect" (i.e., increased rates of treatment accompanied by increased mortality rates), we analyzed patient data from nine registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We assembled a cohort of 34 503 kidney cancer patients and derived incidence, treatment, and mortality trends for kidney cancer, overall and as a function of tumor size. From 1983 to 2002, the overall age-adjusted incidence rate for kidney cancer rose from 7.1 to 10.8 cases per 100 000 US population; tumors ≤4 cm in size accounted for most of the increase. Adjusted rates of renal surgery increased concurrently, most notably for tumors ≤4 cm (0.9–3.6 surgeries per 100 000 US population). However, among kidney cancer patients, all-cause mortality per 100 000 US population increased from 1.5 deaths in 1983 to 6.5 deaths in 2002, with the greatest absolute increase noted for patients with lesions >7 cm. Our results demonstrate that the rising incidence of kidney cancer is largely attributable to an increase in small renal masses that are presumably curable. The fact that increased detection and treatment of small tumors is not reducing mortality argues for a reassessment of the current treatment paradigm.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect
Wong-Ho Chow, W. Marston Linehan, and Susan S. Devesa
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 569-570. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie
Management of the Incidental Renal Mass
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. A. Pettus, T. L. Jang, R. H. Thompson, O. Yossepowitch, M. Kagiwada, and P. Russo
Effect of Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate on Survival in Patients Undergoing Partial or Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cortical Tumors
Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2008; 83(10): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. V. Pandharipande, D. A. Gervais, P. R. Mueller, C. Hur, and G. S. Gazelle
Radiofrequency Ablation versus Nephron-sparing Surgery for Small Unilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma: Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 169 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Weikert, H. Boeing, T. Pischon, C. Weikert, A. Olsen, A. Tjonneland, K. Overvad, N. Becker, J. Linseisen, A. Trichopoulou, et al.
Blood Pressure and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 438 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. L. Sedjo, T. Byers, E. Barrera Jr., C. Cohen, E. T. H. Fontham, L. A. Newman, C. D. Runowicz, A. G. Thorson, M. J. Thun, E. Ward, et al.
A Midpoint Assessment of the American Cancer Society Challenge Goal to Decrease Cancer Incidence by 25% Between 1992 and 2015
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2007; 57(6): 326 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and V. Arndt
Recent Major Progress in Long-Term Cancer Patient Survival Disclosed by Modeled Period Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3274 - 3280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W.-H. Chow, W. M. Linehan, and S. S. Devesa
Re: Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment Effect
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 4, 2007; 99(7): 569 - 570.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.