© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.
ARTICLE |
Effectiveness of Radiation Therapy in Older Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Affiliations of authors: Departments of Therapeutic Radiology (BDS, BGH) and Internal Medicine (GLS, DHG, CPG), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (JEB); Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (BGH); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (TAB)
Correspondence to: Benjamin D. Smith, MD, 2200 Bergquist Dr., Ste. 1, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-9908 (e-mail: bensmith{at}alumni.rice.edu).
Background: For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), radiation therapy after conservative surgery lowers the risk of recurrence. However, emerging evidence suggests that radiation therapy confers only a marginal absolute benefit for older women with DCIS. In a cohort of older women with DCIS, we sought to determine whether radiation therapy was associated with a clinically significant benefit. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare database from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999, we identified 3409 women aged 66 years or older treated with conservative surgery for DCIS. A proportional hazards model tested whether radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk of a combined outcome, defined as a subsequent ipsilateral in situ or invasive breast cancer reported by SEER and/or a subsequent mastectomy reported by Medicare claims. The 5-year event risk was determined for patients without and with high-risk features, which were defined as at least one of the following: age 66–69 years, tumor larger than 2.5 cm, comedo histology, and/or high grade. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk for each component of the combined outcome (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.44). For high-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 13.6% without radiation therapy versus 3.8% with radiation therapy (difference = 9.8%, 95% CI = 6.5 to 13.2; P<.001). For low-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 8.2% without radiation therapy versus 1.0% with radiation therapy (difference = 7.2%, 95% CI = 3.6 to 10.9; P<.001). Among healthy women aged 66–79 years, the number needed to treat with radiation therapy to prevent one event in 5 years was 11 for high-risk patients and 15–16 for low-risk patients. Conclusion: For older women with DCIS, radiation therapy appears to confer a substantial benefit that remains meaningful even among low-risk patients.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Bouchardy, E. Rapiti, S. Blagojevic, A.-T. Vlastos, and G. Vlastos Older Female Cancer Patients: Importance, Causes, and Consequences of Undertreatment J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1858 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Radiation for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, December 18, 2006; 2006(1218): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|