Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(17):1183-1192; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj329
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (191)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buyse, M.
Right arrow Articles by Piccart, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buyse, M.
Right arrow Articles by Piccart, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ARTICLE

Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Marc Buyse, Sherene Loi, Laura van't Veer, Giuseppe Viale, Mauro Delorenzi, Annuska M. Glas, Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies, Jonas Bergh, Rosette Lidereau, Paul Ellis, Adrian Harris, Jan Bogaerts, Patrick Therasse, Arno Floore, Mohamed Amakrane, Fanny Piette, Emiel Rutgers, Christos Sotiriou, Fatima Cardoso, Martine J. Piccart
On behalf of the TRANSBIG Consortium

Affiliations of authors: International Drug Development Institute, Brussels, Belgium (MB, MA, FP); Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium (SL, CS, FC, MJP); Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (LvV, ER); European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy (GV); National Center of Competence in Research Molecular Oncology, Swiss Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Epalinges & the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland (MD); Agendia B.V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (LvV, AMG, AF); Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (MSd'A); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (JB); Centre René Huguenin and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, St Cloud, France (RL); Guy's Hospital, London, U.K. (PE); John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K. (AH); European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Brussels, Belgium (JB, PT)

Correspondence to: BIG/TRANSBIG Secretariat, Institut Jules Bordet, 121 Boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (e-mail: TRANSBIG{at}bordet.be).

Background: A 70-gene signature was previously shown to have prognostic value in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Our goal was to validate the signature in an independent group of patients. Methods: Patients (n = 307, with 137 events after a median follow-up of 13.6 years) from five European centers were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the gene signature classification and on clinical risk classifications. Patients were assigned to the gene signature low-risk group if their 5-year distant metastasis–free survival probability as estimated by the gene signature was greater than 90%. Patients were assigned to the clinicopathologic low-risk group if their 10-year survival probability, as estimated by Adjuvant! software, was greater than 88% (for estrogen receptor [ER]–positive patients) or 92% (for ER-negative patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare time to distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival in high- versus low-risk groups. Results: The 70-gene signature outperformed the clinicopathologic risk assessment in predicting all endpoints. For time to distant metastases, the gene signature yielded HR = 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35 to 4.00) without adjustment for clinical risk and hazard ratios ranging from 2.13 to 2.15 after adjustment for various estimates of clinical risk; clinicopathologic risk using Adjuvant! software yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.68 (95% CI = 0.92 to 3.07). For overall survival, the gene signature yielded an unadjusted HR = 2.79 (95% CI = 1.60 to 4.87) and adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.63 to 2.89; clinicopathologic risk yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.67 (95% CI = 0.93 to 2.98). For patients in the gene signature high-risk group, 10-year overall survival was 0.69 for patients in both the low– and high–clinical risk groups; for patients in the gene signature low-risk group, the 10-year survival rates were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusions: The 70-gene signature adds independent prognostic information to clinicopathologic risk assessment for patients with early breast cancer.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Development and Evaluation of Therapeutically Relevant Predictive Classifiers Using Gene Expression Profiling
Richard Simon
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 1169-1171. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Esserman, Y. Shieh, and I. Thompson
Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer
JAMA, October 21, 2009; 302(15): 1685 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Mook, M. K. Schmidt, B. Weigelt, B. Kreike, I. Eekhout, M. J. van de Vijver, A. M. Glas, A. Floore, E. J. T. Rutgers, and L. J. van 't Veer
The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age
Ann. Onc., October 13, 2009; (2009) mdp388v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A H Sims
Bioinformatics and breast cancer: what can high-throughput genomic approaches actually tell us?
J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2009; 62(10): 879 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Cianfrocca and W. Gradishar
New Molecular Classifications of Breast Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2009; 59(5): 303 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Mandrekar and D. J. Sargent
Clinical Trial Designs for Predictive Biomarker Validation: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Challenges
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2009; 27(24): 4027 - 4034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
F. Correa Geyer and J. S. Reis-Filho
Microarray-based Gene Expression Profiling as a Clinical Tool for Breast Cancer Management: Are We There Yet?
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 285 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. Klatte, D. B. Seligson, J. LaRochelle, B. Shuch, J. W. Said, S. B. Riggs, N. Zomorodian, F. F. Kabbinavar, A. J. Pantuck, and A. S. Belldegrun
Molecular Signatures of Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma to Predict Disease-Free Survival after Nephrectomy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 894 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
N. T. Brewer, J. P. Tzeng, S. E. Lillie, A. S. Edwards, J. M. Peppercorn, and B. K. Rimer
Health Literacy and Cancer Risk Perception: Implications for Genomic Risk Communication
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 157 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Sotiriou and L. Pusztai
Gene-Expression Signatures in Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 2009; 360(8): 790 - 800.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Schmidt, A. Victor, D. Bratzel, D. Boehm, C. Cotarelo, A. Lebrecht, W. Siggelkow, J. G. Hengstler, A. Elsasser, M. Gehrmann, et al.
Long-term outcome prediction by clinicopathological risk classification algorithms in node-negative breast cancer--comparison between Adjuvant!, St Gallen, and a novel risk algorithm used in the prospective randomized Node-Negative-Breast Cancer-3 (NNBC-3) trial
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. J. Wouters, B. Lowenberg, and R. Delwel
A decade of genome-wide gene expression profiling in acute myeloid leukemia: flashback and prospects
Blood, January 8, 2009; 113(2): 291 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. C. Chiang and J. Massague
Molecular Basis of Metastasis
N. Engl. J. Med., December 25, 2008; 359(26): 2814 - 2823.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. N. Jorissen, L. Lipton, P. Gibbs, M. Chapman, J. Desai, I. T. Jones, T. J. Yeatman, P. East, I. P.M. Tomlinson, H. W. Verspaget, et al.
DNA Copy-Number Alterations Underlie Gene Expression Differences between Microsatellite Stable and Unstable Colorectal Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 8061 - 8069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. J. Hassett, M. E. Hughes, J. C. Niland, S. B. Edge, R. L. Theriault, Y.-N. Wong, J. Wilson, W. B. Carter, D. W. Blayney, and J. C. Weeks
Chemotherapy Use for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5553 - 5560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. J. Duffy and J. Crown
A Personalized Approach to Cancer Treatment: How Biomarkers Can Help
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1770 - 1779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. S. Pepe, Z. Feng, H. Janes, P. M. Bossuyt, and J. D. Potter
Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2008; 100(20): 1432 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
B. Haibe-Kains, C. Desmedt, C. Sotiriou, and G. Bontempi
A comparative study of survival models for breast cancer prognostication based on microarray data: does a single gene beat them all?
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2008; 24(19): 2200 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. J.T. Rutgers, L. Pusztai, and R. Bernards
Are Short-Term or Long-Term Recurrence Rates More Important in Breast Cancer Screening?
Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2008; 149(5): 357 - 357.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Desmedt, B. Haibe-Kains, P. Wirapati, M. Buyse, D. Larsimont, G. Bontempi, M. Delorenzi, M. Piccart, and C. Sotiriou
Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5158 - 5165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, B. R. Hoffman, D. W. Chan, S.-L. Ch'ng, E. Hammond, D. F. Hayes, L. A. Liotta, E. F. Petricoin, M. Schmitt, O. J. Semmes, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice: Quality Requirements
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): e1 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
Y. Jiang, G. Casey, I. C. Lavery, Y. Zhang, D. Talantov, M. Martin-McGreevy, M. Skacel, E. Manilich, A. Mazumder, D. Atkins, et al.
Development of a Clinically Feasible Molecular Assay to Predict Recurrence of Stage II Colon Cancer
J. Mol. Diagn., July 1, 2008; 10(4): 346 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. S. Wittner, D. C. Sgroi, P. D. Ryan, T. J. Bruinsma, A. M. Glas, A. Male, S. Dahiya, K. Habin, R. Bernards, D. A. Haber, et al.
Analysis of the MammaPrint Breast Cancer Assay in a Predominantly Postmenopausal Cohort
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 2988 - 2993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. S. Ross, C. Hatzis, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi
Commercialized Multigene Predictors of Clinical Outcome for Breast Cancer
Oncologist, May 1, 2008; 13(5): 477 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Cardoso, M. Saghatchian, A. Thompson, E. Rutgers, and for the TRANSBIG Consortium Steering Committee
Inconsistent Criteria Used in American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2008; 26(12): 2058 - 2059.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. R. Acharya, D. S. Hsu, C. K. Anders, A. Anguiano, K. H. Salter, K. S. Walters, R. C. Redman, S. A. Tuchman, C. A. Moylan, S. Mukherjee, et al.
Gene Expression Signatures, Clinicopathological Features, and Individualized Therapy in Breast Cancer
JAMA, April 2, 2008; 299(13): 1574 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. Pusztai
Current Status of Prognostic Profiling in Breast Cancer
Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 350 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
I. G. Yulug and B. Gur-Dedeoglu
Functional genomics in translational cancer research: focus on breast cancer
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, March 7, 2008; (2008) eln009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. Marchionni, R. F. Wilson, A. C. Wolff, S. Marinopoulos, G. Parmigiani, E. B. Bass, and S. N. Goodman
Systematic Review: Gene Expression Profiling Assays in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2008; 148(5): 358 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Camps, F. M. Buffa, S. Colella, J. Moore, C. Sotiriou, H. Sheldon, A. L. Harris, J. M. Gleadle, and J. Ragoussis
hsa-miR-210 Is Induced by Hypoxia and Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 14(5): 1340 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Sparano and S. Paik
Development of the 21-Gene Assay and Its Application in Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 721 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Cardoso, L. Van't Veer, E. Rutgers, S. Loi, S. Mook, and M. J. Piccart-Gebhart
Clinical Application of the 70-Gene Profile: The MINDACT Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 729 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. K.T. Tan, L. K. Tan, K. Yu, P. H. Tan, M. Lee, L. H. Sii, C. Y. Wong, G. H. Ho, A. W.Y. Yeo, P. K.H. Chow, et al.
Clinical Validation of a Customized Multiple Signature Microarray for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 461 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. Dobbe, K. Gurney, S. Kiekow, J. S. Lafferty, and J. M. Kolesar
Gene-expression assays: New tools to individualize treatment of early-stage breast cancer
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 1, 2008; 65(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. S. Stearman, L. Dwyer-Nield, M. C. Grady, A. M. Malkinson, and M. W. Geraci
A Macrophage Gene Expression Signature Defines a Field Effect in the Lung Tumor Microenvironment
Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 34 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
D. F. Hayes
Markers for Predicting and Evaluating Response to Therapy for Breast Cancer
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Ignatiadis, N. Xenidis, M. Perraki, S. Apostolaki, E. Politaki, M. Kafousi, E. N. Stathopoulos, A. Stathopoulou, E. Lianidou, G. Chlouverakis, et al.
Different Prognostic Value of Cytokeratin-19 mRNA Positive Circulating Tumor Cells According to Estrogen Receptor and HER2 Status in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5194 - 5202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5287 - 5312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Mimeault and S. K. Batra
Interplay of distinct growth factors during epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer progenitor cells and molecular targeting as novel cancer therapies
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1605 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Loi, B. Haibe-Kains, C. Desmedt, and C. Sotiriou
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4317 - 4318.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Thomassen, Q. Tan, F. Eiriksdottir, M. Bak, S. Cold, and T. A. Kruse
Comparison of Gene Sets for Expression Profiling: Prediction of Metastasis from Low-Malignant Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5355 - 5360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Desmedt, F. Piette, S. Loi, Y. Wang, F. Lallemand, B. Haibe-Kains, G. Viale, M. Delorenzi, Y. Zhang, M. S. d'Assignies, et al.
Strong Time Dependence of the 76-Gene Prognostic Signature for Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients in the TRANSBIG Multicenter Independent Validation Series
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3207 - 3214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Larsen, S. J. Pavey, L. H. Passmore, R. V. Bowman, N. K. Hayward, and K. M. Fong
Gene Expression Signature Predicts Recurrence in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2946 - 2954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. M. Webb, M. A. Merritt, G. M. Boyle, and A. C. Green
Microarrays and Epidemiology: Not the Beginning of the End but the End of the Beginning...
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 637 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis
Is Molecular Profiling Ready for Use in Clinical Decision Making?
Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. H. Kushi, M. L. Kwan, M. M. Lee, and C. B. Ambrosone
Lifestyle Factors and Survival in Women with Breast Cancer
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 236S - 242S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Pusztai
Chips to Bedside: Incorporation of Microarray Data into Clinical Practice
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7209 - 7214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Simon
Development and evaluation of therapeutically relevant predictive classifiers using gene expression profiling.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1169 - 1171.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.