Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(14):1014-1018; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj268
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplemental Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, O.
Right arrow Articles by Peto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, O.
Right arrow Articles by Peto, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Inconsistent Association Between the STK15 F31I Genetic Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Risk

Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Claire Palles, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Valerie McCormack, John Whittaker, Alan Ashworth, Julian Peto

Affiliations of authors: The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (OF, NJ, CP, AA); Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK (IdSS, VM, JW, JP); Cancer Research UK Epidemiology & Genetics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research–Sutton, Surrey, UK (JP)

Correspondence to: Olivia Fletcher, PhD, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, U.K. (e-mail: olivia.fletcher{at}icr.ac.uk).

STK15 may be a low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene, and several reports suggest that women who are homozygous for the polymorphic variant F31I have an increased risk of breast cancer. To evaluate this potential breast cancer allele, we genotyped 507 patients with two primary breast cancers and 875 population-based control subjects for the STK15 F31I polymorphism. All statistical tests were two-sided. The Ile/Ile homozygous genotype was not associated with an increased risk in white women of British descent. The odds ratio for developing two primary breast cancers) in Ile/Ile homozygotes was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 1.13), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.58 to 1.06) for a first primary breast cancer. A meta-analysis of this study and other published studies showed statistically significant heterogeneity in the odds ratio estimates (P<.001). This heterogeneity could reflect either population-specific linkage disequilibrium with a functional variant or artifacts such as population stratification or publication bias.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Frank, M. Wiestler, S. Kropp, K. Hemminki, A. B. Spurdle, C. Sutter, B. Wappenschmidt, X. Chen, J. Beesley, J. L. Hopper, et al.
Association of a Common AKAP9 Variant With Breast Cancer Risk: A Collaborative Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2008; 100(6): 437 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
O. Fletcher, N. Johnson, L. Gibson, B. Coupland, A. Fraser, A. Leonard, I. dos Santos Silva, A. Ashworth, R. Houlston, and J. Peto
Association of Genetic Variants at 8q24 with Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 702 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. K. Schmidt, S. Reincke, A. Broeks, L. M. Braaf, F. B.L. Hogervorst, R. A.E.M. Tollenaar, N. Johnson, O. Fletcher, J. Peto, J. Tommiska, et al.
Do MDM2 SNP309 and TP53 R72P Interact in Breast Cancer Susceptibility? A Large Pooled Series from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9584 - 9590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J. Couch, O. Sinilnikova, R. A. Vierkant, V. S. Pankratz, Z. S. Fredericksen, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet, I. Coupier, D. Hughes, A. Hardouin, P. Berthet, et al.
AURKA F31I Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: A Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1416 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Chen, D. Li, C. Wei, S. Sen, A. M. Killary, C. I. Amos, D. B. Evans, J. L. Abbruzzese, and M. L. Frazier
Aurora-A and p16 Polymorphisms Contribute to an Earlier Age at Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer in Caucasians
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 3100 - 3104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
N. Johnson, O. Fletcher, C. Palles, M. Rudd, E. Webb, G. Sellick, I. dos Santos Silva, V. McCormack, L. Gibson, A. Fraser, et al.
Counting potentially functional variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM predicts breast cancer susceptibility
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2007; 16(9): 1051 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Gu, Y. Gong, M. Huang, C. Lu, M. R. Spitz, and X. Wu
Polymorphisms of STK15 (Aurora-A) gene and lung cancer risk in Caucasians
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 350 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis
Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects.
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 4, 2006; 98(19): 1350 - 1353.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.