© 2005 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Randomized Phase III Trial of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Supported by Whole-Blood Hematopoietic Progenitors in Better-Prognosis Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Affiliations of authors: Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK (PL, PJW); Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK (PJW); Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, UK (MERO); Amgen, Cambridge, UK (MRS); Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK (PL, LFA, NT)
Correspondence to: Paul Lorigan, MD, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom (e-mail: paul.lorigan{at}manchester.ac.uk).
Background: Recent dose-intensity studies of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have yielded conflicting results. We carried out a phase III randomized trial in patients with better-prognosis SCLC (i.e., prognostic score of 0–1) to investigate whether doubling the dose density of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy with filgrastim and blood-progenitor-cell support improves survival, compared with standard ICE chemotherapy. Methods: We studied 318 patients with pathologically proven SCLC who were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of ICE chemotherapy with a 4-week (standard arm) or 2-week (dose-dense arm) interval between cycles. Patients in the dose-dense arm received filgrastim subcutaneously daily on days 4 through 14 and had autologous blood collected before cycles 2 through 6, which was returned 24 hours after treatment. Toxicities, including hematologic toxicity and incidence of neutropenic sepsis, were monitored. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The delivered median dose intensity was 99% (interquartile range = 96%–100%) for the standard arm and 182% (interquartile range = 163%–196%) for the dose-dense arm. After a median follow-up of 14 months, overall response to treatment was observed in 118 (80%) of the 148 evaluable patients in the standard arm and in 129 (88%) of the 147 evaluable patients in the dose-dense arm, a statistically non-significant difference. Median overall survival was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.9 to 15.8 months) in the standard arm and 14.4 months (95% CI = 12.7 to 16.0) in the dose-dense arm, and the 2-year survival was 22% (95% CI = 16% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 14% to 27%), respectively—neither difference being statistically significant. The median treatment free time was 286 days (95% CI = 229 to 343 days) for the standard arm and 367 days (95% CI = 321 to 413 days) for the dose-dense arm (difference = 81 days; P = .109). Statistically significantly more hematologic toxicity was reported in the dose-dense arm than in the standard arm, but the number of cycles complicated by neutropenic sepsis was statistically significantly higher in the standard arm than in the dose-dense arm (15.3% versus 11.6%, respectively; difference = 3.7%, 95% CI = –4.1% to 11.5%; P = .03). Conclusions: Dose-dense ICE chemotherapy for SCLC led to shorter treatment duration and less neutropenic sepsis than did standard ICE but did not improve overall survival.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Leyvraz, S. Pampallona, G. Martinelli, F. Ploner, L. Perey, S. Aversa, S. Peters, P. Brunsvig, A. Montes, A. Lange, et al. A Threefold Dose Intensity Treatment With Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, April 16, 2008; 100(8): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. Pujol, J. L. Breton, R. Gervais, M.-L. Tanguy, E. Quoix, P. David, H. Janicot, V. Westeel, S. Gameroff, J. Geneve, et al. Phase III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Thalidomide in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Response to Chemotherapy: An Intergroup Study FNCLCC cleo04 IFCT 00-01 J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3945 - 3951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Crivellari, S. Monfardini, S. Stragliotto, D. Marino, and S. M. L. Aversa Increasing Chemotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Dose Intensity and Density to Megadoses Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 79 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Pedrazzoli, J. Ledermann, J-P Lotz, S Leyvraz, M Aglietta, G Rosti, K. Champion, S Secondino, F Selle, N Ketterer, et al. High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors other than breast cancer in adults Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1479 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Smith, J. Khatcheressian, G. H. Lyman, H. Ozer, J. O. Armitage, L. Balducci, C. L. Bennett, S. B. Cantor, J. Crawford, S. J. Cross, et al. 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of White Blood Cell Growth Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 3187 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Thatcher, W. Qian, P. I. Clark, P. Hopwood, R. J. Sambrook, R. Owens, R. J. Stephens, and D. J. Girling Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide With Midcycle Vincristine Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Good Performance Status: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Results of the British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized LU21 Trial J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8371 - 8379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|