Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(4):315-319; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (97)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ransohoff, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ransohoff, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

COMMENTARY

Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics

David F. Ransohoff

Affiliations of author: Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Correspondence to: David F. Ransohoff, MD, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7080, Bioinformatics Bldg. 4103, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080 (e-mail: ransohof{at}med.unc.edu).

In 2002 a study reported that a blood test, based on pattern-recognition proteomics mass spectroscopy analysis of serum, was nearly 100% sensitive and specific to detect ovarian cancer. Plans to introduce a commercial screening test by early 2004 were delayed amid concerns about whether the approach was reproducible and reliable. In this issue of JNCI, two commentaries discuss whether the initial results are reproducible and whether bias may account for results. This essay describes how threats to validity from chance and bias may cause erroneous results and inflated expectations in the kind of observational research being conducted in several "-omics" fields to assess molecular markers for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. To address such threats and to realize the potential of new -omics technology will require application of appropriate rules of evidence in the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical research about molecular markers.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
Ronghui Xu and Anthony Gamst
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1226. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related Article in JNCI

Importance of Communication Between Producers and Consumers of Publicly Available Experimental Data
Lance A. Liotta, Mark Lowenthal, Arpita Mehta, Thomas P. Conrads, Timothy D. Veenstra, David A. Fishman, and Emanuel F. Petricoin, III
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 310-314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M.G. Taylor, D. P. Ankerst, and R. R. Andridge
Validation of Biomarker-Based Risk Prediction Models
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 5977 - 5983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Zhang, C. Yao, Z. Guo, J. Zou, L. Zhang, H. Xiao, D. Wang, D. Yang, X. Gong, J. Zhu, et al.
Apparently low reproducibility of true differential expression discoveries in microarray studies
Bioinformatics, September 15, 2008; 24(18): 2057 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Tworoger, D. Spentzos, F. T. Grall, T. A. Liebermann, and S. E. Hankinson
Reproducibility of Proteomic Profiles Over 3 Years in Postmenopausal Women Not Taking Postmenopausal Hormones
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1480 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. L. Carvalho, C. Jeronimo, M. M. Kim, R. Henrique, Z. Zhang, M. O. Hoque, S. Chang, M. Brait, C. S. Nayak, W.-W. Jiang, et al.
Evaluation of Promoter Hypermethylation Detection in Body Fluids as a Screening/Diagnosis Tool for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. McLerran, W. E. Grizzle, Z. Feng, I. M. Thompson, W. L. Bigbee, L. H. Cazares, D. W. Chan, J. Dahlgren, J. Diaz, J. Kagan, et al.
SELDI-TOF MS Whole Serum Proteomic Profiling with IMAC Surface Does Not Reliably Detect Prostate Cancer
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Hundt, U. Haug, and H. Brenner
Blood Markers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1935 - 1953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
B. Lumbreras, M. Porta, and I. Hernandez-Aguado
Assessing the social meaning, value and implications of research in genomics
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2007; 61(9): 755 - 756.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. K. Parekh and T. L. Richie
Characterization of Immune Reactivity Profiles Using Microarray Technology May Expedite Identification of Candidate Antigens for Next Generation Malaria Vaccines
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1183 - 1185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Y. Karlan and M. McIntosh
The Quest for Ovarian Cancer's Holy Grail: Can CA-125 Still Be the Chalice of Early Detection?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1303 - 1304.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. A. Kyzas, D. Denaxa-Kyza, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic Effect
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 7, 2007; 99(3): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
C. J. Mason, T. M. Therneau, J. E. Eckel-Passow, K. L. Johnson, A. L. Oberg, J. E. Olson, K. S. Nair, D. C. Muddiman, and H. R. Bergen III
A Method for Automatically Interpreting Mass Spectra of 18O-Labeled Isotopic Clusters
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 305 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. Lance
The Cancer Genome and Diagnostic Blood Tests.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2017 - 2018.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
D. Nedelkov, U. A. Kiernan, E. E. Niederkofler, K. A. Tubbs, and R. W. Nelson
Population Proteomics: The Concept, Attributes, and Potential for Cancer Biomarker Research
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1811 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
R. R. Drake, E. E. Schwegler, G. Malik, J. Diaz, T. Block, A. Mehta, and O. J. Semmes
Lectin Capture Strategies Combined with Mass Spectrometry for the Discovery of Serum Glycoprotein Biomarkers
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1957 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. E. Moore, E. T. Fung, M. McGuire, C. C. Rabkin, A. Molinaro, Z. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Yip, X.-Y. Meng, et al.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein A1 and posttranslationally modified forms of transthyretin as biomarkers for ovarian cancer detection in an independent study population.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. E. Barker, P. D. Wagner, S. E. Stein, D. M. Bunk, S. Srivastava, and G. S. Omenn
Standards for Plasma and Serum Proteomics in Early Cancer Detection: A Needs Assessment Report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology-National Cancer Institute Standards, Methods, Assays, Reagents and Technologies Workshop, August 18-19, 2005
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Serum Proteomic Profiling by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis: Next Steps
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5540 - 5541.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. P A Ioannidis
Commentary: Grading the credibility of molecular evidence for complex diseases
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 572 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. C Millikan
Commentary: The Human Genome: philosopher's stone or magic wand?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 578 - 581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. W. Duncan and S. W. Hunsucker
Proteomics as a Tool for Clinically Relevant Biomarker Discovery and Validation
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2005; 230(11): 808 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Findeisen, D. Sismanidis, M. Riedl, V. Costina, and M. Neumaier
Preanalytical Impact of Sample Handling on Proteome Profiling Experiments with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2409 - 2411.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
T. W. Randolph, B. L. Mitchell, D. F. McLerran, P. D. Lampe, and Z. Feng
Quantifying Peptide Signal in MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Data
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1990 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Honda, Y. Hayashida, T. Umaki, T. Okusaka, T. Kosuge, S. Kikuchi, M. Endo, A. Tsuchida, T. Aoki, T. Itoi, et al.
Possible Detection of Pancreatic Cancer by Plasma Protein Profiling
Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 65(22): 10613 - 10622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Z. Zhang and D. W. Chan
Cancer Proteomics: In Pursuit of "True" Biomarker Discovery
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2283 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
N. L. Anderson
The Roles of Multiple Proteomic Platforms in a Pipeline for New Diagnostics
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1441 - 1444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
O. J. Semmes
The "omics" Haystack: Defining Sources of Sample Bias in Expression Profiling
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1571 - 1572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Xu and A. Gamst
Re: Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 17, 2005; 97(16): 1226 - 1226.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. R. Master
Diagnostic Proteomics: Back to Basics?
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1333 - 1334.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Karsan, B. J. Eigl, S. Flibotte, K. Gelmon, P. Switzer, P. Hassell, D. Harrison, J. Law, M. Hayes, M. Stillwell, et al.
Analytical and Preanalytical Biases in Serum Proteomic Pattern Analysis for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1525 - 1528.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Goggins
Molecular Markers of Early Pancreatic Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4524 - 4531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.