Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(4):307-309; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (129)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baggerly, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coombes, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baggerly, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coombes, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Commentaries in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Signal in Noise: Evaluating Reported Reproducibility of Serum Proteomic Tests for Ovarian Cancer

Keith A. Baggerly, Jeffrey S. Morris, Sarah R. Edmonson, Kevin R. Coombes

Affiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (KAB, JSM, KRC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (SRE)

Correspondence to: Keith A. Baggerly, Department of Biostatistics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Box 447, Houston, TX 77030–4009 (e-mail: kabagg{at}mdanderson.org).

Proteomic profiling of serum initially appeared to be dramatically effective for diagnosis of early-stage ovarian cancer, but these results have proven difficult to reproduce. A recent publication reported good classification in one dataset using results from training on a much earlier dataset, but the authors have since reported that they did not perform the analysis as described. We examined the reproducibility of the proteomic patterns across datasets in more detail. Our analysis reveals that the pattern that enabled successful classification is biologically implausible and that the method, properly applied, does not classify the data accurately. We show that the method used in previously published studies does not establish reproducibility and performs no better than chance for classifying the second dataset, in part because the second dataset is easy to classify correctly. We conclude that the reproducibility of the proteomic profiling approach has yet to be established.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Commentaries in JNCI

Importance of Communication Between Producers and Consumers of Publicly Available Experimental Data
Lance A. Liotta, Mark Lowenthal, Arpita Mehta, Thomas P. Conrads, Timothy D. Veenstra, David A. Fishman, and Emanuel F. Petricoin, III
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 310-314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
David F. Ransohoff
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 315-319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M.G. Taylor, D. P. Ankerst, and R. R. Andridge
Validation of Biomarker-Based Risk Prediction Models
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 5977 - 5983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
M. W. Duncan, H. Roder, and S. W. Hunsucker
Quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, September 1, 2008; 7(5): 355 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Tworoger, D. Spentzos, F. T. Grall, T. A. Liebermann, and S. E. Hankinson
Reproducibility of Proteomic Profiles Over 3 Years in Postmenopausal Women Not Taking Postmenopausal Hormones
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1480 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
A. Barla, G. Jurman, S. Riccadonna, S. Merler, M. Chierici, and C. Furlanello
Machine learning methods for predictive proteomics
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
J. N. McGuire, J. Overgaard, and F. Pociot
Mass spectrometry is only one piece of the puzzle in clinical proteomics
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, February 28, 2008; (2008) eln005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Harezlak, M. Wang, D. Christiani, and X. Lin
Quantitative quality-assessment techniques to compare fractionation and depletion methods in SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry experiments
Bioinformatics, September 15, 2007; 23(18): 2441 - 2448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. K. Parekh and T. L. Richie
Characterization of Immune Reactivity Profiles Using Microarray Technology May Expedite Identification of Candidate Antigens for Next Generation Malaria Vaccines
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1183 - 1185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Oncopeptidomics: A Useful Approach for Cancer Diagnosis?
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1004 - 1006.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. F. Lopez, A. Mikulskis, S. Kuzdzal, E. Golenko, E. F. Petricoin III, L. A. Liotta, W. F. Patton, G. R. Whiteley, K. Rosenblatt, P. Gurnani, et al.
A Novel, High-Throughput Workflow for Discovery and Identification of Serum Carrier Protein-Bound Peptide Biomarker Candidates in Ovarian Cancer Samples
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1067 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. F. Timms, E. Arslan-Low, A. Gentry-Maharaj, Z. Luo, D. T'Jampens, V. N. Podust, J. Ford, E. T. Fung, A. Gammerman, I. Jacobs, et al.
Preanalytic Influence of Sample Handling on SELDI-TOF Serum Protein Profiles
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 645 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
D. Nedelkov, U. A. Kiernan, E. E. Niederkofler, K. A. Tubbs, and R. W. Nelson
Population Proteomics: The Concept, Attributes, and Potential for Cancer Biomarker Research
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1811 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. E. Moore, E. T. Fung, M. McGuire, C. C. Rabkin, A. Molinaro, Z. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Yip, X.-Y. Meng, et al.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein A1 and posttranslationally modified forms of transthyretin as biomarkers for ovarian cancer detection in an independent study population.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Fisher Wilson
The rocky road to useful cancer biomarkers.
Ann Intern Med, June 20, 2006; 144(12): 945 - 948.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Serum Proteomic Profiling by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis: Next Steps
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5540 - 5541.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. C Millikan
Commentary: The Human Genome: philosopher's stone or magic wand?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 578 - 581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Validation of breast cancer biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry.
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 771 - 772.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Y. Han, C. N. Landen Jr, A. A. Kamat, A. Lopez, D. P. Bender, P. Mueller, R. Schmandt, D. M. Gershenson, and A. K. Sood
Preoperative Serum Tissue Factor Levels Are an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Ovarian Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. W. Duncan and S. W. Hunsucker
Proteomics as a Tool for Clinically Relevant Biomarker Discovery and Validation
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2005; 230(11): 808 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Findeisen, D. Sismanidis, M. Riedl, V. Costina, and M. Neumaier
Preanalytical Impact of Sample Handling on Proteome Profiling Experiments with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2409 - 2411.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
T. W. Randolph, B. L. Mitchell, D. F. McLerran, P. D. Lampe, and Z. Feng
Quantifying Peptide Signal in MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Data
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1990 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Z. Zhang and D. W. Chan
Cancer Proteomics: In Pursuit of "True" Biomarker Discovery
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2283 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
N. L. Anderson
The Roles of Multiple Proteomic Platforms in a Pipeline for New Diagnostics
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1441 - 1444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. F. Lopez, A. Mikulskis, S. Kuzdzal, D. A. Bennett, J. Kelly, E. Golenko, J. DiCesare, E. Denoyer, W. F. Patton, R. Ediger, et al.
High-Resolution Serum Proteomic Profiling of Alzheimer Disease Samples Reveals Disease-Specific, Carrier-Protein-Bound Mass Signatures
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1946 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Karsan, B. J. Eigl, S. Flibotte, K. Gelmon, P. Switzer, P. Hassell, D. Harrison, J. Law, M. Hayes, M. Stillwell, et al.
Analytical and Preanalytical Biases in Serum Proteomic Pattern Analysis for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1525 - 1528.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Goggins
Molecular Markers of Early Pancreatic Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4524 - 4531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Liotta, M. Lowenthal, A. Mehta, T. P. Conrads, T. D. Veenstra, D. A. Fishman, and E. F. Petricoin III
Importance of Communication Between Producers and Consumers of Publicly Available Experimental Data
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 16, 2005; 97(4): 310 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. F. Ransohoff
Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 16, 2005; 97(4): 315 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.