Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(22):1652-1662; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji372
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (97)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wolmark, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wolmark, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Current Status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study

Bernard Fisher, Joseph P. Costantino, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Reena S. Cecchini, Walter M. Cronin, Andre Robidoux, Therese B. Bevers, Maureen T. Kavanah, James N. Atkins, Richard G. Margolese, Carolyn D. Runowicz, Joan M. James, Leslie G. Ford, Norman Wolmark

Affiliations of authors: Operations Center, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (BF, DLW, NW); Biostatistical Center, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (JPC, RSC, WMC); Hotel-Dieu de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (AR); University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (TBB); Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (MTK); Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC (JNA); Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (RGM); Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT (CDR); Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA (JMJ); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (LGF); Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)

Correspondence to: Bernard Fisher, MD, University of Pittsburgh/Department of Surgery, Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Suite 350, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180 (e-mail: fisherb2{at}upmc.edu).

Background: Initial findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1) demonstrated that tamoxifen reduced the risk of estrogen receptor–positive tumors and osteoporotic fractures in women at increased risk for breast cancer. Side effects of varying clinical significance were observed. The trial was unblinded because of the positive results, and follow-up continued. This report updates our initial findings. Methods: Women (n = 13 388) were randomly assigned to receive placebo or tamoxifen for 5 years. Rates of breast cancer and other events were compared by the use of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Estimates of the net benefit from 5 years of tamoxifen therapy were compared by age, race, and categories of predicted breast cancer risk. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: After 7 years of follow-up, the cumulative rate of invasive breast cancer was reduced from 42.5 per 1000 women in the placebo group to 24.8 per 1000 women in the tamoxifen group (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.70) and the cumulative rate of noninvasive breast cancer was reduced from 15.8 per 1000 women in the placebo group to 10.2 per 1000 women in the tamoxifen group (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.89). These reductions were similar to those seen in the initial report. Tamoxifen led to a 32% reduction in osteoporotic fractures (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.92). Relative risks of stroke, deep-vein thrombosis, and cataracts (which increased with tamoxifen) and of ischemic heart disease and death (which were not changed with tamoxifen) were also similar to those initially reported. Risks of pulmonary embolism were approximately 11% lower than in the original report, and risks of endometrial cancer were about 29% higher, but these differences were not statistically significant. The net benefit achieved with tamoxifen varied according to age, race, and level of breast cancer risk. Conclusions: Despite the potential bias caused by the unblinding of the P-1 trial, the magnitudes of all beneficial and undesirable treatment effects of tamoxifen were similar to those initially reported, with notable reductions in breast cancer and increased risks of thromboembolic events and endometrial cancer. Readily identifiable subsets of individuals comprising 2.5 million women could derive a net benefit from the drug.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Current Status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study
Jack Cuzick, John F. Forbes, and Anthony Howell
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 643. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
V. C. Jordan
The 38th David A. Karnofsky Lecture: The Paradoxical Actions of Estrogen in Breast Cancer--Survival or Death?
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2008; 26(18): 3073 - 3082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
V. C. Jordan
The Rise of Raloxifene and the Fall of Invasive Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 831 - 833.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Men's HealthHome page
J. Jayachandran and S. J. Freedland
Prevention of Prostate Cancer: What We Know and Where We Are Going
American Journal of Men's Health, June 1, 2008; 2(2): 178 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. Gehrig, J. Lane, and M. I. O'Connor
Osteoporosis: Management and Treatment Strategies for Orthopaedic Surgeons
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1362 - 1374.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. H. Geerts, D. Bergqvist, G. F. Pineo, J. A. Heit, C. M. Samama, M. R. Lassen, and C. W. Colwell
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 381S - 453S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S.-C. Weng, Y. Kashida, S. K. Kulp, D. Wang, R. W. Brueggemeier, C. L. Shapiro, and C.-S. Chen
Sensitizing estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells to tamoxifen with OSU-03012, a novel celecoxib-derived phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1/Akt signaling inhibitor
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 800 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Eastell, J. E. Adams, R. E. Coleman, A. Howell, R. A. Hannon, J. Cuzick, J. R. Mackey, M. W. Beckmann, and G. Clack
Effect of Anastrozole on Bone Mineral Density: 5-Year Results From the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial 18233230
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1051 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Parton and I. E. Smith
Controversies in the Management of Patients With Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 745 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. L. Kahn
Moving Research From Bench to Bedside to Community: There Is Still More to Do
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 26(4): 523 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. Hardman, E. Emmerson, L. Campbell, and G. S. Ashcroft
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Accelerate Cutaneous Wound Healing in Ovariectomized Female Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2008; 149(2): 551 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. Bertelsen, L. Bernstein, J. H. Olsen, L. Mellemkjaer, R. W. Haile, C. F. Lynch, K. E. Malone, H. Anton-Culver, J. Christensen, B. Langholz, et al.
Effect of Systemic Adjuvant Treatment on Risk for Contralateral Breast Cancer in the Women's Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 2, 2008; 100(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Fatouros, G. Baltoyiannis, and D. H. Roukos
The Predominant Role of Surgery in the Prevention and New Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 21 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. C. Jordan and B. W. O'Malley
Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators and Antihormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5815 - 5824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. C. Willey and C. Cocilovo
Screening and Follow-up of the Patient at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2007; 110(6): 1404 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
V. C. Jordan
Estrogen Receptors in BRCA1-Mutant Breast Cancer: Now You See Them, Now You Don't
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1655 - 1657.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. C. Jordan
Tamoxifen or Raloxifene for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Tale of Two Choices Point
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2207 - 2209.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Fabian
Tamoxifen or Raloxifene in Postmenopausal Women for Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Tale of Two Choices Counterpoint
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2210 - 2212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
T. L. Horn, K. E. O. Torres, J. M. Naylor, M. J. Cwik, C. J. Detrisac, I. M. Kapetanovic, R. A. Lubet, J. A. Crowell, and D. L. McCormick
Subchronic Toxicity and Toxicogenomic Evaluation of Tamoxifen Citrate + Bexarotene in Female Rats
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2007; 99(2): 612 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
W. Chu, A. Fyles, E. M. Sellers, D. R. McCready, J. Murphy, T. Pal, and S. A. Narod
Association between CYP3A4 genotype and risk of endometrial cancer following tamoxifen use
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2007; 28(10): 2139 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Hoque, H. L. Parnes, M. E. Stefanek, J. V. Heymach, P. H. Brown, and S. M. Lippman
Meeting Report: Fifth Annual AACR Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 8989 - 8993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Decensi, S. Gandini, D. Serrano, M. Cazzaniga, M. Pizzamiglio, F. Maffini, G. Pelosi, C. Daldoss, U. Omodei, H. Johansson, et al.
Randomized Dose-Ranging Trial of Tamoxifen at Low Doses in Hormone Replacement Therapy Users
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4201 - 4209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
T. W. MOODY
Thymosin {alpha}1 as a Chemopreventive Agent in Lung and Breast Cancer
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2007; 1112(1): 297 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Robson and K. Offit
Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. W. Pinsky, M. Rebner, L. J. Pierce, M. A. Ben-David, F. Vicini, K. A. Hunt, and M. A. Helvie
Recurrent Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Mammographic Features, Method of Detection, and Stage of Recurrence
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 140 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
R. J Santen, N. F Boyd, R. T Chlebowski, S. Cummings, J. Cuzick, M. Dowsett, D. Easton, J. F Forbes, T. Key, S. E Hankinson, et al.
Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. M. van den Berg, H. van Tinteren, N. van Zandwijk, C. Visser, A. Pasic, C. Kooi, T. G. Sutedja, P. Baas, K. Grunberg, W. J. Mooi, et al.
The Influence of Fluticasone Inhalation on Markers of Carcinogenesis in Bronchial Epithelium
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2007; 175(10): 1061 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
U. Veronesi, P. Maisonneuve, N. Rotmensz, B. Bonanni, P. Boyle, G. Viale, A. Costa, V. Sacchini, R. Travaglini, G. D'Aiuto, et al.
Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Late Results of the Italian Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trial Among Women With Hysterectomy
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 2, 2007; 99(9): 727 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
I. Larosche, P. Letteron, B. Fromenty, N. Vadrot, A. Abbey-Toby, G. Feldmann, D. Pessayre, and A. Mansouri
Tamoxifen Inhibits Topoisomerases, Depletes Mitochondrial DNA, and Triggers Steatosis in Mouse Liver
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 526 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
V. C. Jordan
SERMs: Meeting the Promise of Multifunctional Medicines
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2007; 99(5): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. M. Dallal, J. Sullivan-Halley, R. K. Ross, Y. Wang, D. Deapen, P. L. Horn-Ross, P. Reynolds, D. O. Stram, C. A. Clarke, H. Anton-Culver, et al.
Long-term Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancer: The California Teachers Study
Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2007; 167(4): 408 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
U. Veronesi, P. Maisonneuve, and A. Decensi
Tamoxifen: An Enduring Star
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 21, 2007; 99(4): 258 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Cuzick, J. F. Forbes, I. Sestak, S. Cawthorn, H. Hamed, K. Holli, and A. Howell
Long-Term Results of Tamoxifen Prophylaxis for Breast Cancer--96-Month Follow-up of the Randomized IBIS-I Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 21, 2007; 99(4): 272 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. J. Powles, S. Ashley, A. Tidy, I. E. Smith, and M. Dowsett
Twenty-Year Follow-up of the Royal Marsden Randomized, Double-Blinded Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 21, 2007; 99(4): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Armstrong, D. A. Quistberg, E. Micco, S. Domchek, and C. Guerra
Prescription of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention by primary care physicians.
Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2006; 166(20): 2260 - 2265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
V. G VOGEL
Recent Results from Clinical Trials Using SERMs to Reduce the Risk of Breast Cancer
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2006; 1089(1): 127 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. V. Lacey Jr, M. H. Greene, S. S. Buys, D. Reding, T. L. Riley, C. D. Berg, R. M. Fagerstrom, and P. Hartge
Ovarian Cancer Screening in Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2006; 108(5): 1176 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. C. Jordan
The Science of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Concept to Clinical Practice
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5010 - 5013.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. J. Gradishar and D. Cella
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators and Prevention of Invasive Breast Cancer
JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2784 - 2786.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, S. M. Lippman, A. J. Dannenberg, C. C. Sigman, H. L. Pearce, B. J. Reid, E. Szabo, V. C. Jordan, M. R. Spitz, G. B. Mills, et al.
Progress in Chemoprevention Drug Development: The Promise of Molecular Biomarkers for Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cancer--A Plan to Move Forward
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 12(12): 3661 - 3697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
E. V. McCloskey
Aromatase Inhibitors and Bone Health
IBMS BoneKEy, June 1, 2006; 3(6): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Cuzick, J. F. Forbes, and A. Howell
Re: Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 3, 2006; 98(9): 643 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Fisher and J. P. Costantino
RESPONSE: Re: Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Current Status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 3, 2006; 98(9): 643 - 644.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. S. Beattie, J. P. Costantino, S. R. Cummings, D. L. Wickerham, V. G. Vogel, M. Dowsett, E. J. Folkerd, W. C. Willett, N. Wolmark, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Sex Hormones, Breast Cancer Risk, and Tamoxifen Response: An Ancillary Study in the NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1)
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 18, 2006; 98(2): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Prevention: Extended Follow-Up
Journal Watch (General), December 20, 2005; 2005(1220): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.