© 2005 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Alcohol and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Defined by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status: A Prospective Cohort Study
Affiliations of authors: National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Nutritional Epidemiology (RS, TR-R, AW), Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (WY), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Breast Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Centre, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (SS); Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Boston, MA (GAC)
Correspondence to: Alicja Wolk, Dr Med Sc, The National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Nobelsväg 13, PO Box 210, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: Alicja.Wolk{at}ki.se).
Background: Alcohol intake has been reported to be positively associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer; however, the association with the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of the breast tumors remains unclear. Methods: Self-reported data on alcohol consumption were collected in 1987 and 1997 from 51 847 postmenopausal women in the population-based Swedish Mammography Cohort. Through June 30, 2004, 1188 invasive breast cancer case patients with known ER and PR status were identified during an average 8.3-year follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate multivariable relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer, adjusting for age; family history of breast cancer; body mass index; height; parity; age at menarche, first birth, and menopause; education level; use of postmenopausal hormones; and diet. Heterogeneity among groups was evaluated using the Wald test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Alcohol consumption was associated with an increased risk for the development of ER-positive (+) tumors, irrespective of PR status (highest intake [
10 g of alcohol per day] versus nondrinkers, multivariable RR = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.80; Ptrend<.049 for ER+PR+ tumors; and RR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.56 to 3.56; Ptrend<.001 for ER+PR– tumors). The absolute rate of ER+ breast cancer (standardized to the age distribution of person-years experienced by all study participants using 5-year age categories) was 232 per 100 000 person-years among women in the highest category of alcohol intake, and 158 per 100 000 person-years among nondrinkers. No association was observed between alcohol intake and the risk of developing ER– tumors. Furthermore, we observed a statistically significant interaction between alcohol intake and the use of postmenopausal hormones on the risk for ER+PR+ tumors (Pinteraction = .039). Conclusion: The observed association between risk of developing postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer and alcohol drinking, especially among those women who use postmenopausal hormones, may be important, because the majority of breast tumors among postmenopausal women overexpress ER.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Zhang, I-M. Lee, J. E. Manson, N. R. Cook, W. C. Willett, and J. E. Buring Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Study Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2007; 165(6): 667 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Veronesi, P. Maisonneuve, and A. Decensi Tamoxifen: An Enduring Star J Natl Cancer Inst, February 21, 2007; 99(4): 258 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2478 - 2483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. U. Rosenberg, K. Einarsdottir, E. I. Friman, S. Wedren, P. W. Dickman, P. Hall, and C. Magnusson Risk Factors for Hormone Receptor-Defined Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2482 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|