Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(17):1254-1261; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Tables
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (81)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arpino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Elledge, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arpino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Elledge, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Progesterone Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Association With Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Tamoxifen Resistance

Grazia Arpino, Heidi Weiss, Adrian V. Lee, Rachel Schiff, Sabino De Placido, C. Kent Osborne, Richard M. Elledge

Affiliations of authors: Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine and The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (GA, HW, AVL, RS, CKO, RME); Dipartimento di Endocrinologia e Oncologia Molecolare e Clinica, Universita di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy (SDP)

Correspondence to: Richard M. Elledge, MD, Breast Care Center, 6550 Fannin St., Ste. 701, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: relledge{at}breastcenter.tmc.edu).

Background: Clinical data indicate that estrogen receptor–positive/progesterone receptor–negative (ER+/PR) breast cancers are less sensitive to tamoxifen than are ER+/PR+ tumors. It has also been reported that tamoxifen may be less effective in tumors that overexpress either HER-2 or HER-1 (epidermal growth factor receptor) and that signaling through these receptors reduces PR expression in experimental models. We hypothesized that ER+/PR breast tumors are more likely than ER+/PR+ breast tumors to have an aggressive phenotype, to express HER-1 and overexpress HER-2, and are less likely to benefit from tamoxifen adjuvant therapy. Methods: Clinical and biological features of 31 415 patients with ER+/PR+ tumors were compared with those of 13 404 patients with ER+/PR tumors. Association between disease-free survival (DFS) and HER-1 and HER-2 status was analyzed in a subset of 11 399 patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression or Kaplan–Meier analyses, and all statistical tests were two-sided. Results: ER+/PR tumors were more frequent in older patients, were larger in size, had a higher S-phase fraction, and were more likely to be aneuploid than ER+/PR+ tumors. Furthermore, three times as many ER+/PR tumors as ER+/PR+ tumors expressed HER-1 (25% versus 8%; P<.001) and 50% more overexpressed HER-2 (21% versus 14%; P<.001). Among all tamoxifen-treated women, recurrence was higher among women with HER-1–expressing tumors than with HER-1–negative tumors (HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.5; P = .05); a stronger association between worse DFS and HER-2 overexpression was observed (HR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 4.3; P = .006). However, results varied by PR status. Among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+/PR+ tumors, HER-1 or HER-2 status was not associated with worse DFS. Among women with ER+/PR tumors, however, both HER-1 expression (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.0 to 5.4; P = .036) and HER-2 overexpression (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1 to 6.0; P = .022) were associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence. Conclusions: ER+/PR tumors express higher levels of HER-1 and HER-2 and display more aggressive features than ER+/PR+ tumors. As in laboratory models, lack of PR expression in ER+ tumors may be a surrogate marker of aberrant growth factor signaling that could contribute to the tamoxifen resistance observed in these tumors.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Evolving Understanding of Growth Regulation in Human Breast Cancer: Interactions of the Steroid and Peptide Growth Regulatory Pathways
Cindy A. Wilson and Dennis J. Slamon
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 1238-1239. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. B. Hardy, B. A. Janowski, C.-C. Chen, and C. R. Mendelson
Progesterone Receptor Inhibits Aromatase and Inflammatory Response Pathways in Breast Cancer Cells via Ligand-Dependent and Ligand-Independent Mechanisms
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 22(8): 1812 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Masri, S. Phung, X. Wang, X. Wu, Y.-C. Yuan, L. Wagman, and S. Chen
Genome-Wide Analysis of Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant, Tamoxifen-Resistant, and Long-Term Estrogen-Deprived Cells Reveals a Role for Estrogen Receptor
Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4910 - 4918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. H. Chen, O. Nalcioglu, and M. Y. Su
MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter?
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1024 - 1026.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. Arpino, L. Wiechmann, C. K. Osborne, and R. Schiff
Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and the HER Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Family: Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Implications for Endocrine Therapy Resistance
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 217 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Wu, M. J. Fackler, M. K. Halushka, D. W. Molavi, M. E. Taylor, W. W. Teo, C. Griffin, J. Fetting, N. E. Davidson, A. M. De Marzo, et al.
Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Metastases: Comparison of Therapeutic Target Expression and Promoter Methylation Between Primary Tumors and Their Multifocal Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 1938 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Dowsett, C. Allred, J. Knox, E. Quinn, J. Salter, C. Wale, J. Cuzick, J. Houghton, N. Williams, E. Mallon, et al.
Relationship Between Quantitative Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Expression and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) Status With Recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1059 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Colleoni, G. Viale, D. Zahrieh, L. Bottiglieri, R. D. Gelber, P. Veronesi, A. Balduzzi, R. Torrisi, A. Luini, M. Intra, et al.
Expression of ER, PgR, HER1, HER2, and response: a study of preoperative chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Parton and I. E. Smith
Controversies in the Management of Patients With Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 745 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al.
Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 806 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. C. Jordan and B. W. O'Malley
Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators and Antihormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5815 - 5824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. C. Harrell, W. W. Dye, D. M.E. Harvell, M. Pinto, P. Jedlicka, C. A. Sartorius, and K. B. Horwitz
Estrogen Insensitivity in a Model of Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10582 - 10591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G. D Francis, M. Dimech, L. Giles, and A. Hopkins
Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1277 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. A. Rakha, M. E. El-Sayed, A. R. Green, E. C. Paish, D. G. Powe, J. Gee, R. I. Nicholson, A. H.S. Lee, J. F.R. Robertson, and I. O. Ellis
Biologic and Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer With Single Hormone Receptor Positive Phenotype
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4772 - 4778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. E. Smith, G. Walsh, A. Skene, A. Llombart, J. I. Mayordomo, S. Detre, J. Salter, E. Clark, P. Magill, and M. Dowsett
A Phase II Placebo-Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Anastrozole Alone or With Gefitinib in Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3816 - 3822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Bartsch, C. Wenzel, G. Altorjai, U. Pluschnig, R. M. Mader, M. Gnant, R. Jakesz, M. Rudas, C. C. Zielinski, and G. G. Steger
Her2 and Progesterone Receptor Status Are Not Predictive of Response to Fulvestrant Treatment
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4435 - 4439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. M. Giltnane, L. Ryden, M. Cregger, P.-O. Bendahl, K. Jirstrom, and D. L. Rimm
Quantitative Measurement of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is a Negative Predictive Factor for Tamoxifen Response in Hormone Receptor Positive Premenopausal Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 3007 - 3014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Naderi, A. E. Teschendorff, J. Beigel, M. Cariati, I. O. Ellis, J. D. Brenton, and C. Caldas
BEX2 Is Overexpressed in a Subset of Primary Breast Cancers and Mediates Nerve Growth Factor/Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Inhibition of Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6725 - 6736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. M. Silva and M. A. Shupnik
Integration of Steroid and Growth Factor Pathways in Breast Cancer: Focus on Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription and Their Potential Role in Resistance
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 21(7): 1499 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
N. V. Dimitrov, P. Colucci, and S. Nagpal
Some Aspects of the Endocrine Profile and Management of Hormone-Dependent Male Breast Cancer
Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 798 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L Mauriac, A Keshaviah, M Debled, H Mouridsen, J. Forbes, B Thurlimann, R Paridaens, A Monnier, I Lang, A Wardley, et al.
Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Massarweh and R. Schiff
Unraveling the Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 1950 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H. Kennecke, I. Olivotto, C Speers, B Norris, S. Chia, C Bryce, and K. Gelmon
Late risk of relapse and mortality among postmenopausal women with estrogen responsive early breast cancer after 5 years of tamoxifen
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan
Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status
Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2478 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S. Massarweh and R. Schiff
Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: exploiting estrogen receptor/growth factor signaling crosstalk
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(Supplement_1): S15 - S24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. G. Hicks, B. J. Yoder, S. Short, S. Tarr, N. Prescott, J. P. Crowe, A. E. Dawson, G. T. Budd, S. Sizemore, M. Cicek, et al.
Loss of Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1 Protein Expression Predicts Reduced Disease-Free Survival in Subsets of Breast Cancer Patients.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6702 - 6708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R Ponzone, F Montemurro, F Maggiorotto, C Robba, D Gregori, M. Jacomuzzi, F Kubatzki, D Marenco, A Dominguez, N Biglia, et al.
Clinical outcome of adjuvant endocrine treatment according to PR and HER-2 status in early breast cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1631 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. J. Filardo, C. T. Graeber, J. A. Quinn, M. B. Resnick, D. Giri, R. A. DeLellis, M. M. Steinhoff, and E. Sabo
Distribution of GPR30, a Seven Membrane-Spanning Estrogen Receptor, in Primary Breast Cancer and its Association with Clinicopathologic Determinants of Tumor Progression.
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6359 - 6366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. Moy and P. E. Goss
Lapatinib: Current Status and Future Directions in Breast Cancer
Oncologist, November 1, 2006; 11(10): 1047 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Kim, M. Kaneko, K. Arihiro, M. Emi, K. Tanabe, S. Murakami, A. Osaki, and K. Inai
Extranuclear expression of hormone receptors in primary breast cancer
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 1213 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Stendahl, L. Ryden, B. Nordenskjold, P. E. Jonsson, G. Landberg, and K. Jirstrom
High Progesterone Receptor Expression Correlates to the Effect of Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4614 - 4618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
P. D. Ryan and P. E. Goss
Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Peri- and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 718 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Neven, N. Pochet, M. Drijkoningen, F. Amant, F. De Smet, R. Paridaens, M.-R. Christiaens, and I. Vergote
Progesterone Receptor in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: The Association Between HER-2 and Lymph Node Involvement Is Age Related
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2595 - 2595.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
V. C. Jordan
Pak up your breast tumor--and grow!
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 17, 2006; 98(10): 657 - 659.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Ponzone, F. Maggiorotto, C. Robba, L. Fuso, and P. Sismondi
Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status: An Independent Influence on the Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1481 - 1482.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. M. Swain
Aromatase Inhibitors -- A Triumph of Translational Oncology
N. Engl. J. Med., December 29, 2005; 353(26): 2807 - 2809.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
X. Cui, R. Schiff, G. Arpino, C. K. Osborne, and A. V. Lee
Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7721 - 7735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. A. Wilson and D. J. Slamon
Evolving Understanding of Growth Regulation in Human Breast Cancer: Interactions of the Steroid and Peptide Growth Regulatory Pathways
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 7, 2005; 97(17): 1238 - 1239.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.