© 2005 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Infections and 2-Year Absolute Risk of Cervical Precancer in Women With Equivocal or Mild Cytologic Abnormalities
for the ALTS Group
Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (PEC, MS) and Division of Cancer Prevention (DS), National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD; Departments of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM (CMW)
Correspondence to: Philip E. Castle, PhD, MPH, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd., MSC 7234, Bethesda, MD 20892-7234 (e-mail: castlep{at}mail.nih.gov).
Background: The 2-year absolute risk for cervical precancer attributable to infection by human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16), the most common and oncogenic HPV type, in the millions of women diagnosed annually with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology has not been definitively evaluated. Methods: Baseline cervical specimens of 5060 women with equivocal (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) or mildly abnormal (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]) cytology were tested for HPV DNA using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and type-specific L1 consensus primer polymerase chain reaction. We calculated absolute risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cumulative diagnosis, during the 2-year study period, of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) (n = 535) or cancer (n = 7) (collectively referred to as
CIN3) and compared risk by HPV16 status and by other oncogenic HPV types using logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The baseline prevalences of HPV16 in women with ASCUS or LSIL cytology were 14.9% and 21.1%, respectively. Women with ASCUS or LSIL cytology who were HPV16 DNA positive at baseline had 2-year cumulative absolute risks for
CIN3 of 32.5% (95% CI = 28.4% to 36.8%) and 39.1% (95% CI = 33.8% to 44.7%), respectively. By comparison, women with ASCUS who were positive by HC2 for other oncogenic HPV types combined had an 8.4% (95% CI = 6.9% to 10.4%) risk for
CIN3, which was similar to the risk posed by having ASCUS (risk = 8.8%, 95% CI = 7.9% to 9.8%) without knowledge of the oncogenic HPV DNA status. Women with LSILs who were positive by HC2 for other oncogenic HPV types combined had a 9.9% (95% CI = 8.0% to 12.0%) 2-year risk for
CIN3, which was less than the risk posed by having LSILs (risk = 15.0%, 95% CI = 13.3% to 16.9%) without knowledge of the oncogenic HPV DNA status. Together, women with ASCUS or LSILs who were HPV16-positive had the highest 2-year risk for
CIN3 compared with women who were HPV-negative (odds ratio [OR] = 38, 95% CI = 22 to 68; P<.001 ), fivefold greater than the increased risk in women who were positive for other oncogenic HPV types (OR = 7.2, 95%CI = 4.2 to 13, P<.001). Conclusions: Distinguishing the high absolute risk for cervical precancer in HPV16-positive women from the lower risk posed by other oncogenic HPV types might have clinical implications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Erali, D. C. Pattison, C. T. Wittwer, and C. A. Petti Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Using an Automated Film-Based Chip Array J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2009; 11(5): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dal Bello, A. Spinillo, P. Alberizzi, S. Cesari, B. Gardella, and E. M. Silini Validation of the SPF10 LiPA Human Papillomavirus Typing Assay Using Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Cervical Biopsy Samples J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2009; 47(7): 2175 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Porras, A. C. Rodriguez, A. Hildesheim, R. Herrero, P. Gonzalez, S. Wacholder, R. D. Burk, and M. Schiffman Human Papillomavirus Types by Age in Cervical Cancer Precursors: Predominance of Human Papillomavirus 16 in Young Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 863 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Koshiol, L. Lindsay, J. M. Pimenta, C. Poole, D. Jenkins, and J. S. Smith Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2008; 168(2): 123 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Sawaya Adding Human Papillomavirus Testing to Cytology for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: Shooting First and Asking Questions Later Ann Intern Med, April 1, 2008; 148(7): 557 - 559. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Wong, R. C.-K. Chan, W. S. Nichols, and S. Bose Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Atypical Squamous Cervical Cytology: the Invader HPV Test as a New Screening Assay J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 46(3): 869 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vinokurova, N. Wentzensen, I. Kraus, R. Klaes, C. Driesch, P. Melsheimer, F. Kisseljov, M. Durst, A. Schneider, and M. von Knebel Doeberitz Type-Dependent Integration Frequency of Human Papillomavirus Genomes in Cervical Lesions Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 307 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Castle, P. E. Gravitt, D. Solomon, C. M. Wheeler, and M. Schiffman Comparison of Linear Array and Line Blot Assay for Detection of Human Papillomavirus and Diagnosis of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in the Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 46(1): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Coutlee, D. Rouleau, G. Ghattas, C. Hankins, S. Vezina, P. Cote, J. Macleod, A. de Pokomandy, D. Money, S. Walmsley, et al. Confirmatory Real-Time PCR Assay for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 52 Infection in Anogenital Specimens Screened for HPV Infection with the Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2007; 45(11): 3821 - 3823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. A. Hasan, E. Bates, F. Takeshita, A. Biliato, R. Accardi, V. Bouvard, M. Mansour, I. Vincent, L. Gissmann, T. Iftner, et al. TLR9 Expression and Function Is Abolished by the Cervical Cancer-Associated Human Papillomavirus Type 16 J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 3186 - 3197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Halfon, E. Trepo, G. Antoniotti, C. Bernot, P. Cart-Lamy, H. Khiri, D. Thibaud, J. Marron, A. Martineau, G. Penaranda, et al. Prospective Evaluation of the Hybrid Capture 2 and AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Tests for Detection of 13 High-Risk HPV Genotypes in Atypical Squamous Cells of Uncertain Significance J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 313 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Saslow, P. E. Castle, J. T. Cox, D. D. Davey, M. H. Einstein, D. G. Ferris, S. J. Goldie, D. M. Harper, W. Kinney, A.-B. Moscicki, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Use to Prevent Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2007; 57(1): 7 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. van Hamont, M. A. P. C. van Ham, J. M. J. E. Bakkers, L. F. A. G. Massuger, and W. J. G. Melchers Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotyping Test and the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test. J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3122 - 3129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Burk and R. DeSalle The tango and tangle of human papillomavirus and the human genome. J Natl Cancer Inst, August 2, 2006; 98(15): 1026 - 1027. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. T. P. Brink, C. J. L. M. Meijer, M. A. H. M. Wiegerinck, T. E. Nieboer, R. F. P. M. Kruitwagen, F. van Kemenade, N. Fransen Daalmeijer, A. T. Hesselink, J. Berkhof, and P. J. F. Snijders High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush. J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2006; 44(7): 2518 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Berkhof, N. W.J. Bulkmans, M. C.G. Bleeker, S. Bulk, P. J.F. Snijders, F. J. Voorhorst, and C. J.L.M. Meijer Human papillomavirus type-specific 18-month risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with a normal or borderline/mildly dyskaryotic smear. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1268 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Trottier, S. Mahmud, M. C. Costa, J. P. Sobrinho, E. Duarte-Franco, T. E. Rohan, A. Ferenczy, L. L. Villa, and E. L. Franco Human papillomavirus infections with multiple types and risk of cervical neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1274 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Sandri, P. Lentati, E. Benini, P. Dell'Orto, L. Zorzino, F. M. Carozzi, P. Maisonneuve, R. Passerini, M. Salvatici, C. Casadio, et al. Comparison of the Digene HC2 Assay and the Roche AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Test for Detection of High-Risk HPV Genotypes in Cervical Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2006; 44(6): 2141 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Kreimer, R. S. Guido, D. Solomon, M. Schiffman, S. Wacholder, J. Jeronimo, C. M. Wheeler, P. E. Castle, and for the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group Human papillomavirus testing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk for posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 disease. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 908 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Grodzki, G. Besson, C. Clavel, A. Arslan, S. Franceschi, P. Birembaut, M. Tommasino, and I. Zehbe Increased Risk for Cervical Disease Progression of French Women Infected with the Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6-350G Variant. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 820 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schiffman and P. E Castle When to test women for human papillomavirus BMJ, January 14, 2006; 332(7533): 61 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Sawaya A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance JAMA, November 2, 2005; 294(17): 2210 - 2218. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||










