© 2004 by Oxford University Press
© 2004 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Affiliations of authors: Department of Public Health and Primary Care (DB, JE, FW, ATP, SS) and Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit (ATP), Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Correspondence to: Dejana Braithwaite, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, U.K. (e-mail: dkb22{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk)
Background: Identification of a genetic basis underlying certain types of cancer has led to an increase in demand for genetic counseling about individual risks of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the quality and strength of evidence relating to psychological outcomes of genetic counseling for familial cancer. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched to identify controlled trials and prospective studies that examined the effect of genetic counseling on risk perception, knowledge, anxiety, cancer-specific worry, depression, and cancer surveillance. Twenty-one studies from 25 papers met inclusion criteria, including five controlled trials and 16 prospective studies. Analysis of each outcome was stratified by short-term (
1 month) and long-term (
3 months) follow-up. Trial evidence was assessed with standardized differences of the means at follow-up between intervention and comparison groups, and these data were pooled by use of random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Meta-analysis of controlled trials showed that genetic counseling improved knowledge of cancer genetics (pooled short-term difference = 0.70 U, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 to 1.26 U) but did not alter the level of perceived risk (pooled short-term difference = 0.10 U, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.04 U). Prospective studies reported improvements in the accuracy of perceived risk. No effect was observed in controlled trials on general anxiety (pooled long-term effect = 0.05 U, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.31 U) or cancer-specific worry (pooled long-term difference = 0.14 U, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.06 U), although several prospective studies demonstrated short-term reductions in these outcomes. Few studies examined cancer surveillance behaviors, and no studies attempted to measure informed choice. Conclusions: Genetic counseling for familial cancer is associated with improvement in knowledge but does not have an adverse effect on affective outcomes. We urge further investigation of these findings through well-designed, well-reported, randomized controlled trials with suitable comparison groups and additional outcome measures. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:12233]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. McAllister, K. Payne, R. MacLeod, S. Nicholls, Dian Donnai, and L. Davies Patient Empowerment in Clinical Genetics Services J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 895 - 905. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nexoe, P. A. Halvorsen, and I. S. Kristiansen Review Article: Critiques of the risk concept -- valid or not? Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 35(6): 648 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Ropka, J. Wenzel, E. K. Phillips, M. Siadaty, and J. T. Philbrick Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 840 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Michie, K. Lester, J. Pinto, and T. M. Marteau Communicating Risk Information in Genetic Counseling: An Observational Study Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 589 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Miller, P. Roussi, M. B. Daly, J. S. Buzaglo, K. Sherman, A. K. Godwin, A. Balshem, and M. E. Atchison Enhanced Counseling for Women Undergoing BRCA1/2 Testing: Impact on Subsequent Decision Making About Risk Reduction Behaviors Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 654 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, D. J. Bowen, and S. L. R. Kardia Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 686 - 701. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Walter and J. Emery 'Coming Down the Line'-- Patients' Understanding of Their Family History of Common Chronic Disease Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2005; 3(5): 405 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




