Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(2):122-133; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh017
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A. Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton

Affiliations of authors: Department of Public Health and Primary Care (DB, JE, FW, ATP, SS) and Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit (ATP), Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Correspondence to: Dejana Braithwaite, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, U.K. (e-mail: dkb22{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk)

Background: Identification of a genetic basis underlying certain types of cancer has led to an increase in demand for genetic counseling about individual risks of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the quality and strength of evidence relating to psychological outcomes of genetic counseling for familial cancer. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched to identify controlled trials and prospective studies that examined the effect of genetic counseling on risk perception, knowledge, anxiety, cancer-specific worry, depression, and cancer surveillance. Twenty-one studies from 25 papers met inclusion criteria, including five controlled trials and 16 prospective studies. Analysis of each outcome was stratified by short-term (<=1 month) and long-term (>=3 months) follow-up. Trial evidence was assessed with standardized differences of the means at follow-up between intervention and comparison groups, and these data were pooled by use of random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Meta-analysis of controlled trials showed that genetic counseling improved knowledge of cancer genetics (pooled short-term difference = 0.70 U, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 to 1.26 U) but did not alter the level of perceived risk (pooled short-term difference = –0.10 U, 95% CI = –0.23 to 0.04 U). Prospective studies reported improvements in the accuracy of perceived risk. No effect was observed in controlled trials on general anxiety (pooled long-term effect = 0.05 U, 95% CI = –0.21 to 0.31 U) or cancer-specific worry (pooled long-term difference = –0.14 U, 95% CI = –0.35 to 0.06 U), although several prospective studies demonstrated short-term reductions in these outcomes. Few studies examined cancer surveillance behaviors, and no studies attempted to measure informed choice. Conclusions: Genetic counseling for familial cancer is associated with improvement in knowledge but does not have an adverse effect on affective outcomes. We urge further investigation of these findings through well-designed, well-reported, randomized controlled trials with suitable comparison groups and additional outcome measures. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:122–33]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
M. McAllister, K. Payne, R. MacLeod, S. Nicholls, Dian Donnai, and L. Davies
Patient Empowerment in Clinical Genetics Services
J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 895 - 905.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
J. Nexoe, P. A. Halvorsen, and I. S. Kristiansen
Review Article: Critiques of the risk concept -- valid or not?
Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 35(6): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. E. Ropka, J. Wenzel, E. K. Phillips, M. Siadaty, and J. T. Philbrick
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 840 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. Michie, K. Lester, J. Pinto, and T. M. Marteau
Communicating Risk Information in Genetic Counseling: An Observational Study
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 589 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. M. Miller, P. Roussi, M. B. Daly, J. S. Buzaglo, K. Sherman, A. K. Godwin, A. Balshem, and M. E. Atchison
Enhanced Counseling for Women Undergoing BRCA1/2 Testing: Impact on Subsequent Decision Making About Risk Reduction Behaviors
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 654 - 667.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
C. Wang, D. J. Bowen, and S. L. R. Kardia
Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 686 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
F. M. Walter and J. Emery
'Coming Down the Line'-- Patients' Understanding of Their Family History of Common Chronic Disease
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2005; 3(5): 405 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.